Factorio Forums

enterisys wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:17 pm For all the bio-weapon propaganda enjoyers.

Why no one believes in the falsification of the Apollo flights. Because no matter how well you organize everything, there will always be someone who messes up everything.

I did not believe in biolaboratory until Russia began to demand an investigation from all countries.
It means they've got something.

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:24 pm Why no one believes in the falsification of the Apollo flights. Because no matter how well you organize everything, there will always be someone who messes up everything.

I did not believe in biolaboratory until Russia began to demand an investigation from all countries.
It means they've got something.

Luckily your country is no longer in position to demand anything from anyone

mmmPI wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:23 pm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_ ... _Flight_17

+
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberia ... light_1812
+
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:24 pm I did not believe in biolaboratory until Russia began to demand an investigation from all countries.
It means they've got something.

I want someone to be prosecuted, that means he's guilty

very good experience of justice

(thank you for documenting the 2 other you were refering to that makes it clear which one you select which is probably a random pick on a list)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_I ... Flight_752

Also that you are on mobile

mmmPI wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:29 pm I want someone to be prosecuted, that means he's guilty
very good experience of justice

Nobody canceled the prize of innocence. if Russia said A, she would have to say B

Thanks for the link, I didn't know about that at all.

Nobody canceled the prize of innocence. if Russia said A, she would have to say B

you should try to say it again with different words, because your sentence makes no sense to me

Thanks for the link, I didn't know about that at all.

tragic accident in a cycle of violence, knowing what happened makes it easier to not create mistrust in the long term

Also...

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:27 pm +
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberia ... light_1812
+
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

These are old. Far predate the current on goings or government. So really not sure what your point here was.

plus it's biaised since it's western and therefore it is impossible to know the truth because there are other version out there on the internet

mmmPI wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:36 pm you should try to say it again with different words, because your sentence makes no sense to me

in the current situation, Russia needs to be 110% sure before starting this adventure with biolabs. All experts will examine everything under a microscope to find a errors.

mmmPI wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:44 pm plus it's biaised since it's western and therefore it is impossible to know the truth because there are other version out there on the internet

I was not talking about the crashes themselves, but about the fact that people constantly screw up. on military radars, in Chernobyl at nuclear power plants, on the design of Fukushima.

So someone missed the target plane, easy.

i don't think it's likely that after refusing to comply to UN vote, 1 week later asking for UN to work to investigate baseless claim makes sense.

There was a man once who said "it's very hard to find a black cat in a dark room, especially when the cat is not there."

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:50 pm I was not talking about the crashes themselves, but about the fact that people constantly screw up.

I know i was just merely pointing at what is called a biais of confirmation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

That's the part when you claim wikipedia is biaised because it's western when it's used to point out to facts that are outside or contradict your narrative but when it support your narrative then you don't say it's biais anymore

mmmPI wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:56 pm i don't think it's likely that after refusing to comply to UN vote, 1 week later asking for UN to work to investigate baseless claim makes sense.

I know no more than you, so we wait and see.

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:24 pm I did not believe in biolaboratory until Russia began to demand an investigation from all countries.
It means they've got something.

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:00 pm I know no more than you, so we wait and see.

Well no it means you are taking everything for granted and don't have comon sense to use "doubt"

mmmPI wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:59 pm
I know i was just merely pointing at what is called a biais of confirmation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

There are too many Russian bots here, you confused me with one of them.

But my opinion is the same. freely moderated source of information, what could be wrong with it.

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:04 pm

mmmPI wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:59 pm
I know i was just merely pointing at what is called a biais of confirmation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

There are too many Russian bots here, you confused me with one of them.

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:19 pm
3 downed civilian aircraft in peacetime by the military of different countries do not tell you about this?

No i didn't you are the one who accept wikipedia as a non-biaised sourced when it follow your narrative and otherwise no you say it's biaised. For example when you look at the page of russia invasion you said it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Russ ... of_Ukraine

Then when it's used [wikipedia] as a source to illustrate your plane accident story, you don't claim it's a biaised source anymore.

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:04 pm But my opinion is the same. freely moderated source of information, what could be wrong with it.

You say A=> B, then you say but i don't know A. this not opinion nor source of information, it's just confused rumbling

mmmPI wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:08 pm Then when it's used [wikipedia] as a source to illustrate your plane accident story, you don't claim it's a biaised source anymore.

it's just a reference to the event, I could use links to discovery channel's "air crash investigation" to show which cases I was talking about.

mmmPI wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:08 pm You say A=> B, then you say but i don't know A. this not opinion nor source of information, it's just confused rumbling

I am say " I know no more than you" , and we are both know , what Russia start this biolab investigation. This "A" , so, we both waiting for "B" from Russia , as it is next step

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 9:20 pm I am say " I know no more than you" , and we are both know , what Russia start this biolab investigation. This "A" , so, we both waiting for "B" from Russia , as it is next step

again confuse rumbling let me show you precisely where you make the mistake in epistemology :

Djmixxx wrote: Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:24 pm I did not believe in biolaboratory until Russia began to demand an investigation from all countries.
It means they've got something.

if russia demand investigation why the sky has turned red, it means the sky is red ?

It's not because you ask the question that the answer is positive, but you conclude as if it's true, one must be very stupid, you don't know lie exist ?

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/you ... 1647034978


Youtube to ban all russian funded media worldwide. No more VPN usable to read putin's diary any idea ?