ravage666 wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 7:37 pm
of course i did but its not relevant. i spend 4-5 hour a day reading and watching about the conflict.
Maybe that's the 24/7 news on tv that gives people the impression that this is what you need to do to improvise yourself expert. If you start "following" what's happening then it makes you someone that is an ignorant compared to people that spend their lives studying the same topic before there was a significant event for the general public. For example there are people that spend years writing books about Ukraine, Russia, Geo-politics and so on. In this you will have what are called "expert". That's different from the journalist that cover several different topics. Or when what you do is following a topic and analising it that would be again something different than having academic or experience that gives expertise in a field.
The choice of what is significant to understand a topic is a list that is bound to be incomplete. Why even try ?
ravage666 wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 7:37 pm
mmmPI wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 6:50 pm
The trucker in Canada has 0 relation with Ukraine for example it started way before because of Covid for example. you justify adding it as a "bonus" which makes little to no sense in relation to the topic.
Same goes for the homeless in california, and the stuff related to legal corruption in america. It's interesting in itself but unrelated.
if you don't see the correlation its because you are blind. probably blinded by bias.
Captain America doesn't fight for Freedom he fight for money and power.
There is no logical link between the first and the second of your proposition. And there is still no link explictly described. Say i'm blind, now describe me how a group of people manifesting in canada against the restriction imposed on them due to the COVID is CORRELATED to what is happening in Ukraine right now ? Or even the relation between Canada and what is happening in Ukraine ? maybe i'm blind, you need to use less cryptic and open sentence for me to understand the factual correlation.
You mention Captain America probably because you wrongly assume i'm american ? therefore i would be biaised toward my own country ? unless i'm a homeless or a trucker right ? in that case i would be biaised against my own country of USA or Canada ?
ravage666 wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 7:37 pm
Which countries are sending military aid to Ukraine?
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/2/2 ... to-ukraine
Do you see whats wrong about sending military aid to Ukraine. Arming Ukrainian make them military target.
America is using them to fight Russian.
America dont care about them, they dont care about ther own people.
What are the Russian demand ? A neutral country.
Isn't the president of Ukraine himself asking for any help he can get for fight off an invasion ? therefore you would need more than insinuation to explain why it would not help Ukraine despite its leader asking for it.
Finland or Switzerland were often cited as an example of neutral country, they support Ukraine too. Do you mean that Russia made a blunder ? since what they want is neutral country according to your words , then there was no insight in the military that a full scale invasion of a 40+million people pacific country would polarize the opinion against you ? It seems hard for me to believe it is possible. It seem more rational to me that Ukaine is being invaded not because Russia wants it neutral but wants it under control.
Do you think Aljazeera will have a tendency to put more blame to the US or less blame to the US when given the choice on a particular topic ? or they are just 1 side with some interest too ?
(it's cheating when you do the question and answer yourself look : What is the putin demand ? => A country that is vassal of Moscow like it was during Soviet time and people to fear him or like him .)
ravage666 wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 7:37 pm
Ukraine (democratic) corruption is similar to Russia (dictator).
yes 50%-50% it's someone on the internet who said it and he spend 4/5 hours a day reading about the subject for at least a week now so it must be true. ( you did an argument of authority without having any authority so i answered with sarcasm sorry ).
Corruption is a form of dishonesty or a criminal offense which is undertaken by a person or an organization which is entrusted with a position of authority, in order to acquire illicit benefits or abuse power for one's personal gain.
"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption"
Therefore saying corruption is legal is by definition a paradox. Since corruption's definition is based on the fact that's illegal.
You know something is wrong when the other person stop trying to make reasonning but just place sentence next to each others to try and have an impact that's not based on reading and analising rationnaly the information presented. What you are trying to say is that there exist corruption in the united states. Which is true and documented but again is not clear how it relates to the current situation in Ukraine, and also why it would matter the corruption in USA as much as in a country that is directly involved in the conflict.
I wish to read about evidence of the USA being involved and not a list of what going wrong there in a way that seem really unrelated.