Page 2 of 2
Re: suggestionsummary
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 4:24 pm
by bobingabout
Although I do like the idea, the current implementation of fast replacable means you can only replace a 1x1 with a 1x1, etc. Electric Furnaces actually share the same fast replace group as stone and steel, but can't be replaced because of the size difference.
ssilk wrote:Prequisites: complete.
Game-value: Simple and useful suggestion.
Costs: Only the current autoreplacement needs to be extended for that a bit.
Opinions: unique.
I use the prosilver board style. Your text is too light to read, in fact because your post was in the "dark" background post rotation, it was almost impossible to even distinguish from the background at all.
Re: allow replacing belts with splitters
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:04 pm
by ssilk
Well, quite off topic, but I can surely say, that if you cannot read the above you need to calibrate your monitor.

But I agree, it's hard to read. The problem is to find a color, which works for all layouts.
Re: allow replacing belts with splitters
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2015 5:32 pm
by bobingabout
ssilk wrote:Well, quite off topic, but I can surely say, that if you cannot read the above you need to calibrate your monitor.

But I agree, it's hard to read. The problem is to find a color, which works for all layouts.
It's a laptop, there's not a lot you can do to calibrate though, just do a software gamma shift or something which has limited results. Anyway, I agree, it is hard coming up with a colour that works everywhere.
Re: allow replacing belts with splitters ☸
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 6:47 pm
by katyal
watch out with auto removing between underground belts...lots of people use them to span assemblers. The times where I would want stuff auto-removed vs times I wouldn't want it feels like its 50/50
Re: allow replacing belts with splitters ☸
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 11:11 pm
by ssilk
But wouldn't that a good idea: Put assembly over a belt, place it. Zommmg! Underground belts under the assembly!
Well I wouldn't make a full automatic out of that (like with the ideas with the automatic choosing of fluids I'm not a fan of such "too smart automatics"), but I think some kind of half-automatic would help a lot (Stupid example: "Replace belt with underground belt? Y/N? How long should the underground belt be? 1-4?").
Well, I dunno exactly, how such complex replacements could work in detail (stupid questions is of course not the right way!) , but I really think, that replacing splitter is just one minimal part of that suggestion.
Re: allow replacing belts with splitters ☸
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 2:13 am
by katyal
A quick replace of the belt and underground belt would work just leave whatever is in the middle alone