Page 1 of 1
Re: Containers
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 9:47 pm
by slpwnd
The containers idea is quite interesting. We discussed it a bit with kovarex couple of evenings ago. We actually thought of a much simpler version than you propose. Basically there would be a Packager and Unpackager entity. They would both be directly connected to the transport belts. The inserters themselves would not operate with the containers - just putting items into the packager and taking them from the unpackager. This would allow bigger throughput only through the belts (not trains / logistic robots).
Re: Containers
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 9:54 pm
by ssilk
Thats good to hear.
This type of setup was my first thought when I begun thinking about this and then I tried to integrate the locomotives with it. But maybe you find a better idea to transport the containers with locomotives... I found, this is needed, but you sit on the "source"

Re: Containers
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:27 pm
by Nirahiel
Well I was thinking of something similar, but different at the same time

Gimme some time to find out if my idea is worth it before posting it
Re: Containers
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:14 pm
by ssilk
Nirahiel wrote:something similar, but different at the same time

Gimme some time to find out if my idea is worth it before posting it
Welcome in my world.
Edit: ignore the first page. Currently the description from splwnd makes much more sense. Currently a quick implementation would be to have special inserters, that greps into a chest and outputs a whole stack onto belt. Or from belt into assembly. Maybe half stacksize would be good, because it doesn't make sense for items,which have stacksize < 4.
Re: Containers
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2022 4:27 am
by ssilk
Stumbled over this and after re-reading I realized that this is implemented as loaders. See especially splwnd’s post.
Moved to implemented