Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post your ideas and suggestions how to improve the game.

Moderator: ickputzdirwech

Post Reply
EpicPartyGuy
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:18 pm
Contact:

Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by EpicPartyGuy »

TL;DR
Restrict roboports to only connect logistic/construction networks with roboports they are connected to via wire.
What ?
I know that logistics/roboports suggestions litter the forum, but I looked through the "frequently suggested" sticky and didn't find this.

The current default (afaik, as of 0.17.54) is that roboports will automatically connect logistic and construction networks with every other roboport within 100 tiles (if their orange areas touch). I propose that if you wire them with either red or green wires (maybe also copper wires?) to other roboports, or other roboports are on the network, they have the option for "Only Connect with Other Roboports In Circuit Network". The roboports would also need to be in range as usual.

In the same vein, it would be interesting to have an option for a check mark of "Isolate this Roboport", which enables a stand-alone mode, removing this roboport from any and all other networks.
Why ?
It expands the functionality and utility of logistics while not impacting "normal" usage and planning of roboports and logistic/construction networks.



Your thoughts?

Tekky
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2016 10:53 am
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by Tekky »

Related threads:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=22737 Logistic Subnetwork
viewtopic.php?f=67&t=8905 Overlapping Logistic Network II
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=69210 Roboport networks
viewtopic.php?f=80&t=43460 Logistic Network and Logistic Chest Extensions

EpicPartyGuy
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2018 7:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by EpicPartyGuy »

Okay, well my post has a method of how to implement it.

Darinth
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2018 12:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by Darinth »

No consistency with existing mechanics.

I'd rather have the ability to setup a roboport to accept a circuit signal and use it to set a 'network ID' and have all roboports with the same ID that are close enough connect. Note that the 'network ID' set by the circuit network would not match the factorio generated logistics network IDs, but would simply act as a method to control what roboports are willing to connect to each other.

mrvn
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 5682
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:10 am
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by mrvn »

My suggestion was to be able to cut the yellow dashed line connecting roboports like one can with copper wires by shift clicking power poles. Add a wireless "wire" to manually connect roboports and you are set.

Darinth
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2018 12:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by Darinth »

mrvn wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 2:37 pm
My suggestion was to be able to cut the yellow dashed line connecting roboports like one can with copper wires by shift clicking power poles. Add a wireless "wire" to manually connect roboports and you are set.
That at least would be using mechanics similar to other known mechanics. I of course a partial to my solution, but that's just how it works. :)

mrvn
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 5682
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:10 am
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by mrvn »

Darinth wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 4:42 pm
mrvn wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 2:37 pm
My suggestion was to be able to cut the yellow dashed line connecting roboports like one can with copper wires by shift clicking power poles. Add a wireless "wire" to manually connect roboports and you are set.
That at least would be using mechanics similar to other known mechanics. I of course a partial to my solution, but that's just how it works. :)
But then you have to remember all those numbers. And just you wait till you have 2 roboport networks with id 23 and when expanding you accidentally connect the two. Now go and change the ID for all roboports in one of those networks. Oh the fun you will have.

urza99814
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:57 am
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by urza99814 »

mrvn wrote:
Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:55 am
Darinth wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 4:42 pm
mrvn wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 2:37 pm
My suggestion was to be able to cut the yellow dashed line connecting roboports like one can with copper wires by shift clicking power poles. Add a wireless "wire" to manually connect roboports and you are set.
That at least would be using mechanics similar to other known mechanics. I of course a partial to my solution, but that's just how it works. :)
But then you have to remember all those numbers. And just you wait till you have 2 roboport networks with id 23 and when expanding you accidentally connect the two. Now go and change the ID for all roboports in one of those networks. Oh the fun you will have.
If you plan ahead that's no problem -- you don't put a constant combinator at each roboport, you put one at the center of each network and wire the rest into that. Then you only have to change it one place. If you accidentally connect the two wires you'll end up with a whole new ID, which could be an issue (although it's easy enough to fix) but if you plan the numbering properly that could probably be a useful feature instead...

Also, isn't connecting networks by wire pretty much how it used to work? I could be wrong as I didn't fully understand all of the mechanics back then, but I though that was kinda how the red wires worked back around 0.13? I like the idea a lot personally... I keep alternating back and forth with each new game I play -- I'll blanket the whole map in a roboport grid, then get annoyed that my robots take FOREVER to do anything, so next game I only drop roboports where I absolutely need them, but then get annoyed that I have to constantly shift roboports and build them one at a time to expand the network...along with remembering to load up the bots if I end up with a new, disconnected grid...

slippycheeze
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 587
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 10:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by slippycheeze »

urza99814 wrote:
Mon Jul 22, 2019 6:34 pm
mrvn wrote:
Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:55 am
Darinth wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 4:42 pm
mrvn wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 2:37 pm
My suggestion was to be able to cut the yellow dashed line connecting roboports like one can with copper wires by shift clicking power poles. Add a wireless "wire" to manually connect roboports and you are set.
That at least would be using mechanics similar to other known mechanics. I of course a partial to my solution, but that's just how it works. :)
But then you have to remember all those numbers. And just you wait till you have 2 roboport networks with id 23 and when expanding you accidentally connect the two. Now go and change the ID for all roboports in one of those networks. Oh the fun you will have.
If you plan ahead that's no problem
Also, Factorio is full of magic numbers, and you either remember them, or run into pain. I don't think the game should protect you from that sort of error, as long as it is reasonably easy to resolve.

To the subject at hand: I'd rather see "circuit" wire used to connect roboports, rather than the reverse. Trying to give players control via expressing a negative is ... usually much harder to model, mentally, than a positive statement: "do connect these" is easier to know what someone meant than "please disconnect these now".

Also, per blueprints and copper wires, having it default to "connect all the things" can be a real pain in the neck at times.

mrvn
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 5682
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:10 am
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by mrvn »

urza99814 wrote:
Mon Jul 22, 2019 6:34 pm
mrvn wrote:
Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:55 am
Darinth wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 4:42 pm
mrvn wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 2:37 pm
My suggestion was to be able to cut the yellow dashed line connecting roboports like one can with copper wires by shift clicking power poles. Add a wireless "wire" to manually connect roboports and you are set.
That at least would be using mechanics similar to other known mechanics. I of course a partial to my solution, but that's just how it works. :)
But then you have to remember all those numbers. And just you wait till you have 2 roboport networks with id 23 and when expanding you accidentally connect the two. Now go and change the ID for all roboports in one of those networks. Oh the fun you will have.
If you plan ahead that's no problem -- you don't put a constant combinator at each roboport, you put one at the center of each network and wire the rest into that. Then you only have to change it one place. If you accidentally connect the two wires you'll end up with a whole new ID, which could be an issue (although it's easy enough to fix) but if you plan the numbering properly that could probably be a useful feature instead...

Also, isn't connecting networks by wire pretty much how it used to work? I could be wrong as I didn't fully understand all of the mechanics back then, but I though that was kinda how the red wires worked back around 0.13? I like the idea a lot personally... I keep alternating back and forth with each new game I play -- I'll blanket the whole map in a roboport grid, then get annoyed that my robots take FOREVER to do anything, so next game I only drop roboports where I absolutely need them, but then get annoyed that I have to constantly shift roboports and build them one at a time to expand the network...along with remembering to load up the bots if I end up with a new, disconnected grid...
Set the ID by wire? Ok, I would have thought you would set it in the GUI of each roboport.

If you connect two grids then all the roboports would end up with a new ID as the sum of the old. All bots on the fly would have no more roboport to go to (still having the old ID). I guess all the bots in roboports would get the new ID (if they leave). I you disconnect then the same thing happens. Bots on the move will fly to the half of the network that still has the ID. Bots in disconnected roboports get the new ID (0).

Having to string wires pole-by-pole across the whole logistic network would suck though. It would get in the way of other wires all the time. I find it often hard enough to make things work with 2 wires as it is. If one of them is then already used for the roboport that makes it even harder. You would need to put down extra poles and run 2 green wires in parallel. Then which wire does what? Makes circuit networks even harder to grasp.

So no, please, don't. Better to add a new wire type apart from the circuit networks.

Darinth
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2018 12:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by Darinth »

Ohh god this got way more complicated than it needs to be real quick. 99% of the time, logistics networks wouldn't need any wiring either way. Their default performance in game is already generally acceptable. Connect to everything in range. The ability to manually wire them together or to give them logistics IDs via a circuit both reasonably accomplish the goals. If you can't remember a few numbers to keep logistics networks separate when needed... I think you may be delving into something that is a bit more complicated than you should be.

Nobody should be using this to manually isolate all of their networks. We need a solution that allows networks to be isolated when it's really useful, not one that will replace the entire current system.

urza99814
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:57 am
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by urza99814 »

mrvn wrote:
Wed Jul 24, 2019 2:57 pm
urza99814 wrote:
Mon Jul 22, 2019 6:34 pm
mrvn wrote:
Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:55 am
Darinth wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 4:42 pm
mrvn wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 2:37 pm
My suggestion was to be able to cut the yellow dashed line connecting roboports like one can with copper wires by shift clicking power poles. Add a wireless "wire" to manually connect roboports and you are set.
That at least would be using mechanics similar to other known mechanics. I of course a partial to my solution, but that's just how it works. :)
But then you have to remember all those numbers. And just you wait till you have 2 roboport networks with id 23 and when expanding you accidentally connect the two. Now go and change the ID for all roboports in one of those networks. Oh the fun you will have.
If you plan ahead that's no problem -- you don't put a constant combinator at each roboport, you put one at the center of each network and wire the rest into that. Then you only have to change it one place. If you accidentally connect the two wires you'll end up with a whole new ID, which could be an issue (although it's easy enough to fix) but if you plan the numbering properly that could probably be a useful feature instead...

Also, isn't connecting networks by wire pretty much how it used to work? I could be wrong as I didn't fully understand all of the mechanics back then, but I though that was kinda how the red wires worked back around 0.13? I like the idea a lot personally... I keep alternating back and forth with each new game I play -- I'll blanket the whole map in a roboport grid, then get annoyed that my robots take FOREVER to do anything, so next game I only drop roboports where I absolutely need them, but then get annoyed that I have to constantly shift roboports and build them one at a time to expand the network...along with remembering to load up the bots if I end up with a new, disconnected grid...
Set the ID by wire? Ok, I would have thought you would set it in the GUI of each roboport.

If you connect two grids then all the roboports would end up with a new ID as the sum of the old. All bots on the fly would have no more roboport to go to (still having the old ID). I guess all the bots in roboports would get the new ID (if they leave). I you disconnect then the same thing happens. Bots on the move will fly to the half of the network that still has the ID. Bots in disconnected roboports get the new ID (0).

Having to string wires pole-by-pole across the whole logistic network would suck though. It would get in the way of other wires all the time. I find it often hard enough to make things work with 2 wires as it is. If one of them is then already used for the roboport that makes it even harder. You would need to put down extra poles and run 2 green wires in parallel. Then which wire does what? Makes circuit networks even harder to grasp.

So no, please, don't. Better to add a new wire type apart from the circuit networks.
I don't think bots are that much of an issue. Bot gets a task, bot completes the task. If the roboport it's going to changes from network 1 to network 3 while the bot is in flight that's no problem, just let it complete the task. When it arrives it will be dispatched for network 3 tasks. Basically the roboport knows which network it is in but bots don't need to. Could end up with a mess if you accidentally connect to a network that's doing pavement and all your bots go join in, but that should be somewhat rare and easy enough to fix.

As for the circuit connections... I was thinking it'd be like other inputs where you chose whatever channel you want to use to set the ID. Same way you can already configure the channel for roboport outputs, which works well enough. If you set nothing then it's some default network that works as they do currently, but you can use circuit networks to get more advanced behavior. You can cover the distance between roboports with two large power poles so it's not THAT much extra wiring. And you *could* always use a constant combinator instead which gives the flexibility of either setting each individual roboport by hand or binding multiple to one ID or wiring up and setting them with some more complicated logic.

mrvn
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 5682
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:10 am
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by mrvn »

urza99814 wrote:
Wed Jul 24, 2019 7:54 pm
mrvn wrote:
Wed Jul 24, 2019 2:57 pm
urza99814 wrote:
Mon Jul 22, 2019 6:34 pm
mrvn wrote:
Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:55 am
Darinth wrote:
Thu Jul 18, 2019 4:42 pm


That at least would be using mechanics similar to other known mechanics. I of course a partial to my solution, but that's just how it works. :)
But then you have to remember all those numbers. And just you wait till you have 2 roboport networks with id 23 and when expanding you accidentally connect the two. Now go and change the ID for all roboports in one of those networks. Oh the fun you will have.
If you plan ahead that's no problem -- you don't put a constant combinator at each roboport, you put one at the center of each network and wire the rest into that. Then you only have to change it one place. If you accidentally connect the two wires you'll end up with a whole new ID, which could be an issue (although it's easy enough to fix) but if you plan the numbering properly that could probably be a useful feature instead...

Also, isn't connecting networks by wire pretty much how it used to work? I could be wrong as I didn't fully understand all of the mechanics back then, but I though that was kinda how the red wires worked back around 0.13? I like the idea a lot personally... I keep alternating back and forth with each new game I play -- I'll blanket the whole map in a roboport grid, then get annoyed that my robots take FOREVER to do anything, so next game I only drop roboports where I absolutely need them, but then get annoyed that I have to constantly shift roboports and build them one at a time to expand the network...along with remembering to load up the bots if I end up with a new, disconnected grid...
Set the ID by wire? Ok, I would have thought you would set it in the GUI of each roboport.

If you connect two grids then all the roboports would end up with a new ID as the sum of the old. All bots on the fly would have no more roboport to go to (still having the old ID). I guess all the bots in roboports would get the new ID (if they leave). I you disconnect then the same thing happens. Bots on the move will fly to the half of the network that still has the ID. Bots in disconnected roboports get the new ID (0).

Having to string wires pole-by-pole across the whole logistic network would suck though. It would get in the way of other wires all the time. I find it often hard enough to make things work with 2 wires as it is. If one of them is then already used for the roboport that makes it even harder. You would need to put down extra poles and run 2 green wires in parallel. Then which wire does what? Makes circuit networks even harder to grasp.

So no, please, don't. Better to add a new wire type apart from the circuit networks.
I don't think bots are that much of an issue. Bot gets a task, bot completes the task. If the roboport it's going to changes from network 1 to network 3 while the bot is in flight that's no problem, just let it complete the task. When it arrives it will be dispatched for network 3 tasks. Basically the roboport knows which network it is in but bots don't need to. Could end up with a mess if you accidentally connect to a network that's doing pavement and all your bots go join in, but that should be somewhat rare and easy enough to fix.
That won't work. The big idea of roboports having an id is so that the regions can overlap without merging. That means a bot that just dropped of an iron plate in a requester chest can be in multiple logistic zones. So which roboport should it go to now? If it doesn't now which logistic zone is belongs to then you will end up with all bots going to one of the zones and the other running out of bots.

McDuff
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:09 am
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by McDuff »

Who was it who had the idea of separating the different functions of roboports up?

slippycheeze
Filter Inserter
Filter Inserter
Posts: 587
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2019 10:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by slippycheeze »

McDuff wrote:
Sat Jul 27, 2019 1:17 pm
Who was it who had the idea of separating the different functions of roboports up?
Well, not me originally, but it sure was me last night. In this case I wanted them split because I don't want, or need, a logistics network, but would like a construction repair network covering some infrastructure.

McDuff
Fast Inserter
Fast Inserter
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:09 am
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by McDuff »

slippycheeze wrote:
Wed Jul 31, 2019 11:27 pm
McDuff wrote:
Sat Jul 27, 2019 1:17 pm
Who was it who had the idea of separating the different functions of roboports up?
Well, not me originally, but it sure was me last night. In this case I wanted them split because I don't want, or need, a logistics network, but would like a construction repair network covering some infrastructure.
Ah, no, different thing. Someone (might have been Bob?) suggested that robot charging, robot network and robot storage should be 3 different buildings. Think you might be the first one I've seen to suggest construction and logistics should be separate.

Serenity
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1000
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 6:16 am
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by Serenity »

Bob's logistics mod has an option to split the roboport into three buildings. It's pretty neat as often you just need more charging

User avatar
BlueTemplar
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 2420
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Isolate roboports by limiting them by circuit networks

Post by BlueTemplar »

I vote too for thick* gold wires auto-connecting roboports (like copper wires on power poles currently do).
*their thickness would also be an indication that they won't fit on poles.

Plus, they would probably look cool, while clearly showing what roboport is connected to which one.
BobDiggity (mod-scenario-pack)

Post Reply

Return to “Ideas and Suggestions”