Factorio Forums

doc776@gmail.com wrote:Seems the wire connector is little off on the bot logistics controller building. Sorry if already posted elsewhere.

fat controller.png

masneoquil wrote:Hello Bob

With the last update I'm having this error when starting up the game: Error while loading entity prototype "thorium-ore"(resource): An infinite resource cant' have a minimum amount of 0.

Bob.jpg

Thanks for all you do.

bobingabout wrote: Strange... Can you also tell me your bob ores mod settings? is thorium enabled, do you have infinite ores enabled etc?

masneoquil wrote:

bobingabout wrote: Strange... Can you also tell me your bob ores mod settings? is thorium enabled, do you have infinite ores enabled etc?

I would love to, the problem is that now since I can't load bobores, I also can't see the options for it. Is there a way I can rollback to the previous version?

 "bobmods-ores-enablebauxite":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablecobaltore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablegemsore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablegoldore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enableleadore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablenickelore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablequartz":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablerutile":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablesilverore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablesulfur":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablethoriumore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enabletinore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enabletungstenore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablewaterores":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enablezincore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-enhancestone":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-gemprobability":{  
         "value":0.05
      },
      "bobmods-ores-gemsfromotherores":{  
         "value":false
      },
      "bobmods-ores-infiniteore":{  
         "value":true
      },
      "bobmods-ores-leadgivesnickel":{  
         "value":false
      },
      "bobmods-ores-leadnickelratio":{  
         "value":0.6
      },
      "bobmods-ores-nickelcobaltratio":{  
         "value":0.4
      },
      "bobmods-ores-nickelgivescobalt":{  
         "value":false
      }

bobingabout wrote:So you have Thorium and Infinite turned on, I'll take a look at that on my end when I can.

EDIT:
Was nothing to do with thorium, or even the bobores mod at all. I missed something in the library. It has been updated, changes as below.



library 0.16.3:
Changes to autoplace broke infinite ores. I changed the richness_base value from 400+ to less than 10 to bring into line with new base game. This caused the calculations for minimum and maximum defaults on infinite ores to be less than 1. I multiplied all new values by 50 to compensate There is also a check to in the function to make sure this value can't be less than 1 (Gems ore would be less than 1 with new richness base, even with the new math)
Changed gas bottle stack size to 10

vtx wrote:I found a weird bug and I think it's cause by your newest update to logistic. We start a new game with that mod updated and seem the recipe for chest requester is not available. Appear in logistic request, was there in research but the recipe is nowhere.

In the previous game before the update the research was allready learned and I can see the recipe.

I have to make that simple mod to fix that https://mods.factorio.com/mod/requestchestfix

-- Chest ballancing.
bobmods.lib.tech.remove_recipe_unlock("construction-robotics", "logistic-chest-passive-provider")
bobmods.lib.tech.add_recipe_unlock("logistic-robotics", "logistic-chest-requester")
bobmods.lib.tech.remove_recipe_unlock("logistic-robotics", "logistic-chest-storage")
bobmods.lib.tech.remove_recipe_unlock("logistic-system", "logistic-chest-requester")

bobingabout wrote:

fishycat wrote:Though I like most of the base game changes, I really don't get the one with the splitters in transport-belt fast replaceable group. It is really annoying when you upgrade your mainbus and accidentally all the splitters...

Fair enough, I can change it for my game, no problem. I like your addition to the inserters, nice one.

personally, I agree, the a splitter is a splitter, a belt is a belt, and an UG belt is an UG belt. I changed it to conform to the new base game, as it was brought to my attention and the change requested.

The alternate solution would be to go and change all the base game splitters back to a splitters group, and UG belts to an UG belts group. Perhaps one day I could add a setting to change the fast replace group of splitters and UG belts to their own group?

bobingabout wrote:Probably the biggest single mod update I've done since 0.16 releases.

Logstics 0.16.4:
Fix that Robotics 3 and Advanced Robots 2 required a Production science pack instead of Logistic.
Fix that roboport was still unlockable by construction/logistic repotics when recipe was overwritten for modular.
Fixed that Logistics 4 had production science pack instead of science pack 3
Fixed LZE circuit network connection.
Fixed Valve circuit network connection.
Fluid wagons now cost only 1 fluid storage tank each.
Removed fluid wagon x3 capacity multipliers, to bring them in line with base game (1 = 25k, 2 = 37.5k, 3 = 50k, A1 = 25k, A2 = 37.5k)
All fluid wagon weights changed to bring them in line with base game (1 = 1000, 2 = 1500, 3 = 2000, A1 = 2000, A2 = 2500)
Armored cargo wagon 2 weight increased to 2500 (was 2000, same as A1, when it can carry more cargo, so should have the +500 like 1 to 2, and 2 to 3)
Construction Robot Technology now unlocks only Storage chest
Logistic Robot Technology now unlocks Passive provider and requester chests.
Logistic system technology now unlocks active provider and buffer chests.
Ballanced robot costs when flying robot frames are turned off.


Inserters 0.16.4:
Fixed Inserter preplace GUI not using the right offset location if near isn't researched.


Warfare 0.16.1:
Removed production science pack from follower robot count 7+
Removed minimum range from artillery ammo
added direction_deviation = 0 and range_deviation = 0 to artillery ammo
Reduced artillery ammo stacksizes to 20
increase base game artillery shell stack size to 20
Increase artillery ammo damage from 400 to 1000 (and robots from 6 to 15)
Increased artillery ammo recipe costs.
Increased artillery turret ammo stack size from 15 to 50
Increase range of tank artillery weapon from 0 to 35 to 8 to 96
Reduced tank artillery firing speed
removed artillery speed upgrades, there's a basegame version now.

RocketManChronicles wrote:These are welcomed changes! Although, increasing the base game artillery shell stack size to 20 seems a bit much, but I will go with it. Thanks for you dedication!

bobingabout wrote:

RocketManChronicles wrote:These are welcomed changes! Although, increasing the base game artillery shell stack size to 20 seems a bit much, but I will go with it. Thanks for you dedication!

I wasn't going to make it that high, but I did it based on the amount of damage it does.
Tank shells stack to 100 and deal 200 damage each, that's 20k damage per stack.
Artillery shells do 1000 damage each, 5 times what Cannon shells do, so I divided the stack size by 5, which is 20. Stacks of 20k damage per stack.

That's my logic behind it.

RocketManChronicles wrote:

bobingabout wrote:

RocketManChronicles wrote:These are welcomed changes! Although, increasing the base game artillery shell stack size to 20 seems a bit much, but I will go with it. Thanks for you dedication!

I wasn't going to make it that high, but I did it based on the amount of damage it does.
Tank shells stack to 100 and deal 200 damage each, that's 20k damage per stack.
Artillery shells do 1000 damage each, 5 times what Cannon shells do, so I divided the stack size by 5, which is 20. Stacks of 20k damage per stack.

That's my logic behind it.

I like your logic! I can only imagine having an 8-car train full of artillery shells arriving at an outpost! Mwa ha ha ha!...

bobingabout wrote:

vtx wrote:I found a weird bug and I think it's cause by your newest update to logistic. We start a new game with that mod updated and seem the recipe for chest requester is not available. Appear in logistic request, was there in research but the recipe is nowhere.

In the previous game before the update the research was allready learned and I can see the recipe.

I have to make that simple mod to fix that https://mods.factorio.com/mod/requestchestfix

Requester chests were removed from the Logistics System research in my latest update, but added to Logistic Robots instead. Can you confirm if the chest is on Logistic Robots, and if no, could you screenshot the list of mods that modifies logistic robot research? (yellow text when you point to the research icon)

In either case, this is my code

Code: Select all

-- Chest ballancing.
bobmods.lib.tech.remove_recipe_unlock("construction-robotics", "logistic-chest-passive-provider")
bobmods.lib.tech.add_recipe_unlock("logistic-robotics", "logistic-chest-requester")
bobmods.lib.tech.remove_recipe_unlock("logistic-robotics", "logistic-chest-storage")
bobmods.lib.tech.remove_recipe_unlock("logistic-system", "logistic-chest-requester")

You can clearly see the second line adds it to Logistic Robots.

I could just comment out that last line, there's no harm in it being unlocked twice (I mean, in the base game the roboport, passive provider and storage chests are unlocked by both the construction and logistics robot research), I just wanted things to be clean (no duplication), but if it causes issues, that's a reason to be messy (have duplication)

bobingabout wrote:removed artillery speed upgrades, there's a basegame version now.