Who else is anxiously awaiting the next 0.18 experimental release with blueprint improvements?

Post all other topics which do not belong to any other category.
Post Reply
EnerJi
Long Handed Inserter
Long Handed Inserter
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:32 am
Contact:

Who else is anxiously awaiting the next 0.18 experimental release with blueprint improvements?

Post by EnerJi »

tenor.gif
tenor.gif (1.38 MiB) Viewed 299 times

User avatar
5thHorseman
Smart Inserter
Smart Inserter
Posts: 1061
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Who else is anxiously awaiting the next 0.18 experimental release with blueprint improvements?

Post by 5thHorseman »

Me. I kinda don't want to play without them.
Image Image

MyrddinE
Burner Inserter
Burner Inserter
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 12:42 am
Contact:

Re: Who else is anxiously awaiting the next 0.18 experimental release with blueprint improvements?

Post by MyrddinE »

It's out, and it's great... BUT...

Rail grids CANNOT be created in a rotationally symmetrical way. :-( Because the center point of a blueprint has to be in the center of a cell, and rail blueprints must be an even size, you can never have the point of rotation match.

This makes it impossible to create a globally-synced grid with your rail parts (one of the biggest reason to use this type of grid) unless you make a unique template for every rotation (NS, EW, and four copies of your corner segments instead of one template you rotate).

Very depressing. :-( I hope they allow for more flexible specification of the point of symmetry, quickly.

Post Reply

Return to “General discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Daeruun