And now we know. The actual data isn't checked during the de-duplicationLoewchen wrote:50709TheYeast wrote:I wondered about that too, but it might just mean that they collect it as a fun usage statistic. Who is going to notice a deleted blueprint, not blame it on their own stupidity, and then go through the trouble of filing a bug report about it?
Anyway, the fact that this got reported seems to be because it is a crafted example. I still doubt this will get reported when it happens accidentally. Even though a message appears on the screen in this case, the receiving blueprint book is probably quite big when it happens for real, and I would just think "oh, okay, I already did that, it's in there somewhere" if it happened to me.