[2.0.15] Science Usage Counts Wrong
Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2024 4:56 pm
Odd that I cannot find an existing report on this... Closest I found is this, but that is for a very old version. And -- it states that the science points are awarded correctly, it's only the statistics that display wrong.
I noticed that my research is going slower than expected, so I investigated... I have the following setup:
There are no modules in the labs, and their research speed is 3.5 (+250%) from research.
When I import Agricultural Science from Gleba, I would expect that the science progressed equals the number of flasks I import, but it does not (remember -- no modules). In the specific example I logged, I imported 1000 flasks from Gleba, and Spidertron was at 2052/2500. After the labs consumed the 1000x flasks, the Spidertron was finished, but the next one in the list (Fish Breeding) was only at 41/500. I would have expected that it should be finished -- what happened to my other 511 flasks?
None of the Gleba flasks turned to spoilage -- I checked.
I checked other times as well, but didn't do an explicit flask count -- only noticed that the research that should have been complete wasn't.
I have not checked if the same issue exists when I don't chain-feed the labs.
I noticed that my research is going slower than expected, so I investigated... I have the following setup:
There are no modules in the labs, and their research speed is 3.5 (+250%) from research.
When I import Agricultural Science from Gleba, I would expect that the science progressed equals the number of flasks I import, but it does not (remember -- no modules). In the specific example I logged, I imported 1000 flasks from Gleba, and Spidertron was at 2052/2500. After the labs consumed the 1000x flasks, the Spidertron was finished, but the next one in the list (Fish Breeding) was only at 41/500. I would have expected that it should be finished -- what happened to my other 511 flasks?
None of the Gleba flasks turned to spoilage -- I checked.
I checked other times as well, but didn't do an explicit flask count -- only noticed that the research that should have been complete wasn't.
I have not checked if the same issue exists when I don't chain-feed the labs.