Page 1 of 1

[2.0.8] Quality module 2 (Rare) shows wrong quality bonus

Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:37 am
by Salmelu
I crafted a Quality module 2 (Rare) and while it shows it should add +3.2% to Quality, slotting it into assembling machine only shows +0.2% increase.
factorio_quality_bug1.png
factorio_quality_bug1.png (89.9 KiB) Viewed 521 times
factorio_quality_bug2.png
factorio_quality_bug2.png (124.53 KiB) Viewed 521 times
Unsure if this is just a display bug, or if the module doesn't work as it should.

Re: [2.0.8] Quality module 2 (Rare) shows wrong quality bonus

Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:42 am
by Zaflis
Likely you have a speed beacon nearby.

Re: [2.0.8] Quality module 2 (Rare) shows wrong quality bonus

Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:45 am
by boskid
I am going to shove this straight into Not a bug because you are not showing all the relevant details and the tooltip clearly shows that issue is on your end.

By having +55% speed and Beacon x1 i can tell you what happened: you have 1 beacon with 2 normal speed-module-1 that give you +60% speed effect but also -3% quality effect. Given the +3.2% effect from quality modules (and -5% speed from it), 3% gets cancelled out and you are left with +0.2%.

Re: [2.0.8] Quality module 2 (Rare) shows wrong quality bonus

Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2024 9:52 am
by Salmelu
boskid wrote: Tue Oct 22, 2024 8:45 am I am going to shove this straight into Not a bug because you are not showing all the relevant details and the tooltip clearly shows that issue is on your end.

By having +55% speed and Beacon x1 i can tell you what happened: you have 1 beacon with 2 normal speed-module-1 that give you +60% speed effect but also -3% quality effect. Given the +3.2% effect from quality modules (and -5% speed from it), 3% gets cancelled out and you are left with +0.2%.
I somehow forgot to put 2+2 together. You are correct it's caused by the beacon and it's not a bug, it just confused me how the first module put added +0.2%, and second module worked normally, since the -3% from the beacon is not explicity stated. Thank you for clarifying.