Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
-
- Burner Inserter
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2020 8:14 am
- Contact:
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
I'll just leave these here...
Left to right:
1-1
2-2
2-2 Unlimited Throughput
2-2 Inline
3-3
4-4
4-4 Inline
5-5
To my knowledge, these are the best available however the 5-5 needs a lot of work, it's a giant mess. There's a really nice 6-6 and 8-8 out there but no one really makes the odd sizes...
Left to right:
1-1
2-2
2-2 Unlimited Throughput
2-2 Inline
3-3
4-4
4-4 Inline
5-5
To my knowledge, these are the best available however the 5-5 needs a lot of work, it's a giant mess. There's a really nice 6-6 and 8-8 out there but no one really makes the odd sizes...
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
viewtopic.php?p=482201#p482201dabalciunas wrote: ↑Wed Oct 14, 2020 11:19 amThis is the only belt design I know which truly guarantees input and output balancing.
The article links also to
https://gist.github.com/Bilka2/aeec4ff7 ... 0cf1046a06
Cool suggestion: Eatable MOUSE-pointers.
Have you used the Advanced Search today?
Need help, question? FAQ - Wiki - Forum help
I still like small signatures...
Have you used the Advanced Search today?
Need help, question? FAQ - Wiki - Forum help
I still like small signatures...
-
- Inserter
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 10:51 am
- Contact:
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
I didn't understand the "2-2 Unlimited Throughput" though, what does it improves over the 2-2 version? Maybe I am missing something here...Fooluaintblack wrote: ↑Thu Oct 15, 2020 8:19 amI'll just leave these here...
Lane Balancers.png
Left to right:
1-1
2-2
2-2 Unlimited Throughput
2-2 Inline
3-3
4-4
4-4 Inline
5-5
To my knowledge, these are the best available however the 5-5 needs a lot of work, it's a giant mess. There's a really nice 6-6 and 8-8 out there but no one really makes the odd sizes...
The ones I posted are true I/O balancers, meaning the can take from any of the 2 lanes of any input belt and then output it to any of the 2 lanes of any output belt. This explains why they look "bigger" than the compact ones.
The 3x3 version you have posted uses more elemements than your 4x4 version, so I would just prefer to use the 4x4 instead of the 3x3.
Below is another slightly different 4x4 design, which also serve as AxB where A and B can be any number between 1 and 4:
And by following the same principle of this 4x4, I also made the 8x8 Full Throughput Balancer: any input lane can be redirected to any of its output lane. Due to the size of the build, minor gaps may occur temporarily until the balancer adapts itself to the new input/output.
- Attachments
-
- 4-belt.jpg (219.95 KiB) Viewed 6115 times
-
- 8x8 Full Throughput Belt Balancer.jpg (455.98 KiB) Viewed 6115 times
Last edited by dabalciunas on Sun May 16, 2021 3:48 pm, edited 6 times in total.
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
The normal 2-2 version shown there only has 1 path for left lane input to get to left lane output, the unlimited one has 2 paths.dabalciunas wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 12:17 pmI didn't understand the "2-2 Unlimited Throughput" though, what does it improves over the 2-2 version? Maybe I am missing something here...
-
- Inserter
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 10:51 am
- Contact:
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
I did not quite understand yet, I think I must be really missing something here... see the attached images here, the left input belt can be diverted to the left output belt in 2 different ways: inverting lanes or not. Is there really a need for the extra elements, considering the output is limited to the same belt speed as the input?Zanthra wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 3:59 pmThe normal 2-2 version shown there only has 1 path for left lane input to get to left lane output, the unlimited one has 2 paths.dabalciunas wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 12:17 pmI didn't understand the "2-2 Unlimited Throughput" though, what does it improves over the 2-2 version? Maybe I am missing something here...
I was so interested on the compact 4x4 desgn, that I decided to fully test it. However unfortunately I have found a throughput issue with this compact 4x4 design: it cannot fullfill the necessary throughput when only left lanes of output belts are consumed, which could lead to starvation of assembly machines. See the image below, it is self-explanatory...
- Attachments
-
- compact 4x4 issue.jpg (497.47 KiB) Viewed 6327 times
-
- 2-belt balancer L - B.png (49.74 KiB) Viewed 6338 times
-
- 2-belt balancer L - A.png (50.73 KiB) Viewed 6338 times
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
dabalciunas, I think you are making an invalid assumption about these lane balancers. Although they have a splinter on the input they should only have one belt as input not two.
Take a look at the designs by disentius in this viewtopic.php?f=202&t=74911 for some two belt lane balancers.
Take a look at the designs by disentius in this viewtopic.php?f=202&t=74911 for some two belt lane balancers.
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
Solution for single lanes.
However, this will break the input balance the moment you have one of the imput lanes starving, not ideal.
However, this will break the input balance the moment you have one of the imput lanes starving, not ideal.
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
That’s for left belt input to left belt output, now do the same for left lane input (from both belts) to left lane output (from both belts), there is only one belt lane of internal capacity for two belt lanes of input.dabalciunas wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 9:32 amI did not quite understand yet, I think I must be really missing something here... see the attached images here, the left input belt can be diverted to the left output belt in 2 different ways: inverting lanes or not. Is there really a need for the extra elements, considering the output is limited to the same belt speed as the input?Zanthra wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 3:59 pmThe normal 2-2 version shown there only has 1 path for left lane input to get to left lane output, the unlimited one has 2 paths.dabalciunas wrote: ↑Sun May 09, 2021 12:17 pmI didn't understand the "2-2 Unlimited Throughput" though, what does it improves over the 2-2 version? Maybe I am missing something here...
Coincidentally the “problem” for the compact 4-4 belt balancer you discovered is the same problem the normal 2-2 belt balancer has, and is the exact problem that the unlimited 2-2 belt balancer solves.
Try the same test on both the 2-2 variants as you did for the 4-4. The normal will have the same problem while the unlimited works perfectly.
Basically in this nomenclature, your 4-4 balancer would be "4-4 Unlimited Throughput".
-
- Inserter
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 10:51 am
- Contact:
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
Oh... I see it now. Thanks for opening my eyes for that issue. I was actually wondering why the 2-2 was so much smaller than the 4-4. The explanation is, there is no free lunch!Zanthra wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 5:11 pm
That’s for left belt input to left belt output, now do the same for left lane input (from both belts) to left lane output (from both belts), there is only one belt lane of internal capacity for two belt lanes of input.
Coincidentally the “problem” for the compact 4-4 belt balancer you discovered is the same problem the normal 2-2 belt balancer has, and is the exact problem that the unlimited 2-2 belt balancer solves.
Try the same test on both the 2-2 variants as you did for the 4-4. The normal will have the same problem while the unlimited works perfectly.
Basically in this nomenclature, your 4-4 balancer would be "4-4 Unlimited Throughput".
Anyway, now we got a 2-2 Full-Thoughput Balancer and a 4-4 Full-Thoughput Balancer
I was not happy with the fact that both of these balancers do not guarantee the output of items to happen in an alternate way, from every available input lane. So I came up with a new 2-2 Full-Thoughput Alternator design, which I have also posted on that thread referenced by Trebor: viewtopic.php?p=545588#p545588
It is this monstrosity, which works like a charm:
- Attachments
-
- 2-Belt Full-Throughput Alternator.jpg (310.47 KiB) Viewed 6233 times
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
dabalciunas wrote: ↑Thu May 13, 2021 1:03 amOh... I see it now. Thanks for opening my eyes for that issue. I was actually wondering why the 2-2 was so much smaller than the 4-4. The explanation is, there is no free lunch!Zanthra wrote: ↑Tue May 11, 2021 5:11 pm
That’s for left belt input to left belt output, now do the same for left lane input (from both belts) to left lane output (from both belts), there is only one belt lane of internal capacity for two belt lanes of input.
Coincidentally the “problem” for the compact 4-4 belt balancer you discovered is the same problem the normal 2-2 belt balancer has, and is the exact problem that the unlimited 2-2 belt balancer solves.
Try the same test on both the 2-2 variants as you did for the 4-4. The normal will have the same problem while the unlimited works perfectly.
Basically in this nomenclature, your 4-4 balancer would be "4-4 Unlimited Throughput".
Anyway, now we got a 2-2 Full-Thoughput Balancer and a 4-4 Full-Thoughput Balancer
I was not happy with the fact that both of these balancers do not guarantee the output of items to happen in an alternate way, from every available input lane. So I came up with a new 2-2 Full-Thoughput Alternator design, which I have also posted on that thread referenced by Trebor: viewtopic.php?p=545588#p545588
It is this monstrosity, which works like a charm:
It's possible to reduce that slightly, as it duplicates much of the work. For example a slightly shortened version:
Blueprint string:
And a diagram showing 2 independent internal lanes of left lane to left lane capacity. Note that it branches after splitting and reconverging the lanes into belts.
As the other one branches before reconverging the lanes:
-
- Inserter
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 10:51 am
- Contact:
Re: Is it possible to input balance a single belt's lanes?
Perfect, good catch! I further improved the compactness of the design, still maintaining all of its original properties, allowing it now to be crossed by other belts.
- Attachments
-
- 2-Belt Full-Throughput Alternator.jpg (296.08 KiB) Viewed 6191 times