Efficiently tearing down logistics networks
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 9:27 pm
I have a recurring problem with outposts. When they run dry, and I want to tear them down, deconstructing the local logistics network becomes a hassle.
Getting rid of the outpost machinery works fine: I use a deconstruction planner with all logistic- and power-related-structures blacklisted. Once the bots finish that job, though, if I issue the obvious "deconstruct everything else" order (omitting a small staging area around the station), any number of things can go wrong. Maybe the order of roboport removals splits the local network. Maybe roboports get depowered before removal in ways that muck something up. If I use another blacklist to leave power alone until after the roboports, maybe the furthest power poles end up outside the remaining network range.
So far, I've dealt with this mostly by minimizing outpost size (e.g. no on-site processing even when it would otherwise make sense), or by deconstructing the network in small stages, starting from the outer edge. That is tedious and requires repeated attention, though.
I feel like there must be a better way, but haven't found one. Any suggestions?
Getting rid of the outpost machinery works fine: I use a deconstruction planner with all logistic- and power-related-structures blacklisted. Once the bots finish that job, though, if I issue the obvious "deconstruct everything else" order (omitting a small staging area around the station), any number of things can go wrong. Maybe the order of roboport removals splits the local network. Maybe roboports get depowered before removal in ways that muck something up. If I use another blacklist to leave power alone until after the roboports, maybe the furthest power poles end up outside the remaining network range.
So far, I've dealt with this mostly by minimizing outpost size (e.g. no on-site processing even when it would otherwise make sense), or by deconstructing the network in small stages, starting from the outer edge. That is tedious and requires repeated attention, though.
I feel like there must be a better way, but haven't found one. Any suggestions?