yep:) And the calculation is a bit different too. shortest distance "as the crow flies"

... A schedule entry will be waited for if, and only if, ALL enabled stops with that name have hit or exceeded their limit or are unreachable. If the train is already moving and the limit if the targeted stop gets reduced, it will try to path to another stop with the same name, but continue moving ...

test the output first with 1 smelter row. (I do) speaker attached to belt, set reading on hold, let speaker beep at anything < 8. let it run a while on speed 64.

Not a Bug.
If you do not want items U238 to go on that side of the belt, you need to set a splitter filter to U235 (left side in picture). Priority means that it will output to the prioritized side only if there is room.

Just did a calculator check, you need 7 more furnaces per blue belt....:) no go. 12 beacons speed only: https://factoriolab.github.io/list?z=eJwrcLbQMjFVy3RK0TJUS.PQ8lQrNtAy1rLVctTSCi5XKzMGAIwtCDs_ 12 beacons prod in furnaces: https://factoriolab.github.io/list?z=eJwrcLbQMjFVy3RK0TJUS.PQclMrNtAy1rLV...

A very interesting UPS comment by boskid:
viewtopic.php?p=562810#p562810

Ran your top 3 saves.
Made 1 modification. i saved them on paused, with the timers on tick 1.
results:
(I calculate difference % on column execution time, since that is the exact value. Effective UPS is a calculated field)

To late:) Already ran another test.: clones from the same save.

Results: My PC: Files attached.

We are in "our tools are not good enough for a meaningful distinction" country now. I wanted to know the consistency of the results, so I took the same save, and copied by saving them under a different name, and ran the benchmark. (the only difference between the saves is that the time of ...

pictures? there are a lot of em around.

Good point about the miners being in range of the beacons. I will adjust the saves and run it again.. thanks!

There is no difference (anymore) between normal and filter inserters ups-wise.

Nice dave. Tested 3 latest saves: Belter v6.9 Stevetrov v2 DaveMcw v6 - 500 belts vertical saves - Fed by miners, mining prod set to 2000, no modules needed ( I changed belter's save in that regard) Results: (dave has the fastest iteration atm) 2022-03-03 17_54_28-bmresults.ods - LibreOffice Calc.png

empty testmap with region cloner and delete empty chunks, marker pointing to 0,0 factorio version 1.55

I am dutch. can I help?
My long time gripe would be that I would like to translate "inserter"with "grijper" instead of "robotarm":)

Correct.
Original thread here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/factorio/comme ... s/f01z85m/



Here is another small difference in throughput between splitters with and without priority set.
viewtopic.php?p=456948#p456948

It is a relative test... it doesn't matter what you use, as long as the different setups in the same test use the same feed.

hewre are a few test results from a while ago:

@flame_Sla:
1. /editor
2. Remove all entities
3. fill with lab tiles
2. /Cheat all