Happy Chanukah to you too!

Henry Loenwind wrote: ↑

Sun Dec 01, 2019 1:05 pm

This feels so ... unnecessary.

As opposed to what? What do you consider the most important feature still missing from the game?

Thank you for your inputs. In this case I suggest changing the confusing phrasing on the reporting page, Reporting should generally be used only if the post breaks forum rules. to something clearer, like Reporting is typically for when posts break forum rules, but can also be used to draw moderator ...

Would you please try doing a clean install of the game and see if this still happens? I think this has something to do with either a broken update or manual tweaking of the game files.

It appears to be related to viewtopic.php?p=465744

Hello everybody, Suppose there's a post (by somebody else) which seems to be posted in the wrong sub-forum (e.g. Suggestions instead of Bugs ). Now I would like to draw the attention of a mod so that it is moved to the appropriate place. What is the right way to do so? Should I use a flag? Should I ...

17.35
No wonder you're having issues. Please try 17.78.

If I understand correctly, what you're suggesting is to keep the English term when localization isn't available. I thought this was happening by default already. Regardless, it's strange that you see so many unlocalized (or broken?) strings, since both the simplified and the traditional Chinese tran...

ssilk wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 17, 2019 5:40 pm

What I want to say: why not use <some mod>

For me the answer is simple - I need this functionality in a non-modded MP game, otherwise I would probably have used LuziferSenpai's "Rich Text Helper"
.

<Also, something about the slippery slope fallacy>

This actually sounds like a bug...

+1. I would love to have some "emoji-like" button near text fields that would allow easy picking of entities to add to text. I mostly link to images of items and not the items themselves (i.e. [img=item/foo-bar-baz] ), so shift-clicking an item/recipe when the chat is open is not useful to...

I realized that some of the tooltips, most notably for splitters, are different between the base game and the new player experience. Is that intended? This issue comes up from time to time in localizations (Crowdin), so I can say with certainty that the developers are well-aware of most (if not all...

Deadlock989 wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 23, 2019 1:40 pm

posila wrote: ↑

Wed Oct 23, 2019 1:11 pm

It's fixed for 0.17.73. Thanks for the report.

Nice one, thank you.

Thanks for the report and the fix!

Is this also a problem in the symbols used for map pings?

I find it strange that you only count "unhandled bug reports". What about "minor issues", of which there are almost 400? I know you guys want to "be done with it already", but you already "admitted" that these were indeed issues. So unless "minor issues&q...

Ok, you win - it's not as simple as I thought.

Preventing underground pipe removal because it would create unconnected underground pair? Tell this to biters: "please choose different path to destroy players base because this pipe is untouchable" or "hey biter, could you please fix underground pipe issue before going for this unde...

No, underground pipes did not connect so there is no fluid mixing. ... Fluid mixing is if you manage to connect two fluid boxes with different filters. I see your point. What I meant was that the pipes appear connected when you glance at them (w/o mousing over). If they appear connected but are not...

So as a solution I have instead prevented the action that triggered the problem. In this case and the upgrade there is an error text imploring the player to fix the blocked connection I think this was fixed in a sub-optimal way, I'll explain why and suggest alternatives. Here's how to make the new ...

I can't see how "in order to prevent you making a mistake, I've taken away the ability for you to pick up something you built" is a good idea for vanilla. I see your point, and yet the scenario you're describing has an important difference from my suggestion - here's what I wrote in the O...

Wait, so the "destroy ingredients in progress" feature already existed before 0.16, that's why it was considered a "bugfix" in 0.17.0 ? Or are you talking about the lost time/energy/pollution ? I believe (though I could be wrong) that even in the latest 0.17.x, when you deconstr...