What if you made the miner reject the productivity effect? It's not like productivity makes any sense in an offshore pump. Would it ignore the mining bonus then?

Did something happen to player.opened?

If this is implemented, it should be as an option.

FYI, it doesn't understand negative numbers either.

Right now the type of the parameter is listed as string whereas in fact it's one of the respective string literals (and the game will error if you try to pass any other string). This affects all instances of the method (including ghost_has_flag).

It says that for fluid prototype, but with item the docs leave you to guess.

edit: Or, hm, an item isn't burnable without a fuel category (unlike fluids, which don't have fuel categories), so maybe this is a pointless distinction.

The reason I think it might be missed is because it's very easy to underestimate the extent having to react to mods changing things. This is something that took me a while to fully realize. I of course knew about it, but the full extend of it took me a while to appreciate. And in this instance even...

Completely agree with Rseding, the name is self-evident.

edit: As for the linked bug, people aren't perfect infallible beings. Notnotmelon might have simply overlooked that event or the possibility that scripted action is something they need to be concerned about. No need to overreact.

That's great news, thank you.

Description missing in both data and runtime docs.

I don't see the connection. A "not-beaconable" flag doesn't make it harder or easier to detect beacon effects (which you can already do by detecting changes to a beacon's modules the same way you described for other entities and find_entities_filtered to look for exisitng beacons), it just...

I see. Thank you for telling me. Workaround time, I guess.

To reproduce: 1. Make the following locale entry: n-items=__1__ __plural_for_parameter_1_{1=item|rest=items}__ 2. Launch the game and run the following command: /c game.print{'n-items', 0.5} 3. Observe the following output: 0.5 1 Expected behavior: The "rest" form gets used, producing the ...

Duplicate of viewtopic.php?f=221&t=100216

darkfrei wrote: ↑

Fri Oct 27, 2023 10:17 am

Also custom sound?

viewtopic.php?f=28&t=109100

Funny that even the examples from the docs themselves declare an array.

What would be even better is something which I don't think exists yet: per-direction variation arrays, e.g. SpriteVariations4Way and AnimationVariations4Way. These would respect the prototype random_variation_on_create property and also the runtime graphics_variation property, so that rotating a va...

The game currently does not support [...] overlapping logistic networks. [...] overlapping networks simply are not supported OH, sO iT DoEs ACtUaLly sUPpOrt It. You just completely ignored what Rseding91 said. :roll: *violent facepalm* You just have to let prototypes specify what kind of logistic n...

The game currently does not support the concept of overlapping logistic networks. Entities that register in logistic networks can only be in 1 network at a time so overlapping networks simply are not supported at the engine level. Oh, so it does actually support it. You just have to let prototypes ...

Suppose there are two overlapping networks. Which one should process logistic requests?