seeing I only needed a smidgen of plastic and urea 50/50 of 100 would have been moooore than enough for my needs.

I am also kind of interested in this, looking to use these for my seablock run, and I would rather discover this now rather than when I am alrady on my planning phase to use them.

Hi, I started my seablock run with FARL added, but I have not made anything FARL related, and it seems I wont really use it in this run. Would there be any risk in removing it from the active mods?

So, I am almost at a point in my seablock playtough I am starting to think about moving to trains and a city block approach.

Does anyone have any recommendations about city block sizing? For the standard roboports and radars a 3x3 chunk is fine, but I dont know bobs enough to make any decision ...

My main pet peeve with the fluid system currently is that fluids cannot be easily split. This is a modded example, but in my current seablock game I have plastic and resin, both which require 100 units of methanol gas, one liquifier supplies 100 units, in an ideal world both would get 50/50, but in ...

wasn't that original terrain type by definition water?

I thought the last tab has this info (the one without time)

This is for .16, I will test for .17 as well, but I use US international keyboard layout, this has dead keys (keys that register, and then act on the next key you type)

When I use the tilde, quote key (usually used to type ñ and ò for example) they keep registered and when I start typing it ends up ...

I wholly support this idea. One of my most frustrating moments in .16 was when I misplaced landfill for the nuclear reactor. Twice it is really hard to see sometimes where landfill begins and ends. We installed waterfill to fix this, but this does feel really cheaty.

Just being able to remove ...

For my blue chips factory I used double stations like this:

BlueChips.png

This factory requires 16 blue belts copper and 14 blue belts iron, so I have 2 of my 1-4-1 stations feeding each. Now this is a retrofit, as it used to be non LTN stations, hence the 6 stackers, you could probably get away ...

Just a question, is this just a visual bug (meaning, is this reported wrong) or do trees actually generate pollution?

I have to agree with Optera here, I only let notifications on for the first half hour or so of setting up LTN, or when debugging a specific issue, it does not have to be pretty, just functional.

Well, we started a new map on .26 and chunks are polluting, it is just not spreading out. these chunks are very dark red. and limited to just the areas where the miners/boilers are located.

I had that as well, since it is complaining it is not a zipped format, just use this command:
this skips the unzipping (which fails since it is not a zip)

And everything is flashing yellow and eats UPS while it is unpowered.

The power switch method is definitely not ideal imho.

indeed, preventing loops is a big one.

My main base omni station is at 2, my main basde omni requester is at 4, this way no trains will loop around supplying rocket fuel from the main base, to the main base.

Regionality is also handy, but not something I have used yet.

In my current game I mainly ...

See Squeak Through

Underground pipes are your friend.

You can place these next to each other.

in the same way it is quite astounding how some forum users react to receiving a negative answer on their feature suggestion.

The most easy way for the end user to solve this would be 32 checkboxes, but the most simple way from dev perspective would be a number entry box so one can enter 3, 11, 256, etc.