We had a desync in AntiElitz's multiplayer stream. Multiple people (but not everybody) desynced. The desync happened around 7:45:00 in the video https://www.twitch.tv/videos/248419397 . The desynced people could not rejoin. We have 2 guesses as to what caused it. Either copy-pasting train stations, ...

One of the things the bothered me about 0.15 sea block was that building the SpaceX components was too easy compared to doing the SpaceX research. By the time you had built a base large enough to complete the FTL research then building 500 of each module to build the FTL drive itself was trivial. T...

Thanks - much better already! If I were to choose, I would lower it even more - it is still very expensive. Perhaps to 5 Drydock Assembly Robots instead of 50? That will still require 10 fusion reactors in total for Drydock Assembly Components, which seems proportional to the stage of SpaceX - the f...

There is meaningfully excessive, and there is just randomly stupidly excessive. The fusion construction bot cost is just stupid, not a fun challenge. Also, the previous version in 0.15 seablock used mk4 bots instead of fusion bots, which was a perfectly meaningful and reasonably cost. It seems likel...

So I tried 0.16 Sea Block. Making 2 Drydock Assembly Components for SpaceX. Each take 50 Assembly robots, which each take 5 Fusion Powered Construction Robots, which each take 1 Portable Fusion Reactor, which each takes 250 Processing Units. So in all, just for Drydock Assembly Components, I need 2*...

So trying 0.16 Sea Block. I am now trying to make the 2 Drydock Assembly Components for SpaceX. Each take 50 Assembly robots, which each take 5 Fusion Powered Construction Robots, which each take 1 Portable Fusion Reactor, which each takes 250 Processing Units. So in all, just for Drydock Assembly C...

This desync occured while trying to join Anti's charity stream megabase.

Desync report (linked since too big to attach): http://thuejk.dk/desync-report-2017-12-21_21-39-49.zip

Duplicate of viewtopic.php?f=7&t=54540

alinde: That looks like a separate bug. You should post it in a new thread instead.

t@h ~> cd Downloads t@h ~/Downloads> cd factorio t@h ~/Downloads/factorio> ./bin/x64/factorio 0.000 2017-12-13 14:24:32; Factorio 0.16.0 (build 34159, linux64, alpha) 0.122 Operating system: Linux (Debian unstable) 0.122 Program arguments: "./bin/x64/factorio" 0.122 Read data path: /home/...

In AntiElitz 100% achievement run, chat and AntiElitz were discussing how to get the Solaris achievement. So the Solaris achievement text says Produce more than 10 GJ per hour using solar panels According to https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?t=48429 , it used to say Produce more than 10 GJ p...

Team Not Anti has had some problems with multiplayer connection errors lately. Some people will simply get a "server not responding" error while trying to join the game. We think the problem is some of our players *cough*CountyCupid*cough*XenoCyber*cough* having very large blueprint librar...

We decided to do a quick blind playthrough of 0.15.0 when it came out. After launching the rocket, I saved the game (in the dialog that pops up when launching the rocket.) However, I am unable to load the resulting savegame, in either 0.15.0 or 0.15.1 . It loads, but the game is paused and the scree...

The number X/s when hovering over miners is actually OreCount*((MiningSpeed-MiningHardness)*MiningSpeed/MiningTime)/normal. Which is meaningless.

I am using the "EndlessResourcesWithFullYield" mod, which is useful for testing base designs without miners running out of ore. However, the mod makes electric miners show wrong "Expected resources" when hovering over an electric miner with the mouse. For example, it can show &qu...

If the replay gets disabled (through changing mods or major versions) that would make any exchange string created from that map now disable the replay. Well, you could still save a was-original-with-replay setting in the savegame. That's the same reason it's not persisted through multiple new-games...

I think the developers have just not understood the problem.

Xeanoa wrote:It's not a bug, that much is clear.

How is that clear? It is obviously something that nobody would ever design to work that way if they sat down and thought about it. That IS a bug.

The chemical plant crafting speed affects the ratios of recipes that consume an ingredient made in a chemical plant, but are themselves made in an assembler. Having the chemical plant crafting speed be 1 would mean it wouldn't match any of the assemblers at all; at least now it matches yellow assem...

Having different crafting speeds of assembling machines makes sense. A grey assembling machine having a crafting speed of 0.5 is meaningful to distinguish it from e.g. yellow assembling machines with crafting speed of 1.25. The crafting speeds makes it a bit harder to calculate e.g. ratios, but the ...