I like new rail construction system. I always wanted it to work exactly this way.

per tick, per second, per minute... Could you already unify time measurement?

dzilla77 wrote: ↑

Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:49 pm

I think he is speaking Belter from the Expanse series.

TLDR; the Productivity Science Pack recipe is just a steaming pile of unbalanced shit. As simple as that. 30 rails per !3! science packs. Here is detailed comparison of science packs prices : https://www.factorio.com/blog/post/fff-275 I also don't like this recipe very much, but completely for othe...

As I understand, flamethrower turret damage consists of 2 or even 3 parts : instant damage, ignite damage and ground damage. Which of this damages stack from multiple turrets?

have some normal (bullets = physical dmg) turrets from what ive read, damage types matter alot more in 0.17 Yeah, I will add a row of bullet turrets later to deal with toughest enemies. Bullet turrets have lowest range and HP and use most expensive ammo, so they must be placed behind laser/flame tu...

Not only accumulators. It also lacks of dependency to Solar energy.
As long as satellite is the only outcome of this research, it must have all ingredient dependencies.

I'm thinking of something like this, but I'm not sure (1) should I make 1 tile gap between turrets? (2) should I make entire separate row of flamethrower turrets?

Qon wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:10 am

https://mods.factorio.com/mod/LaboriousLaboratory

Enjoy!
Please tell me what you think of it :3

Oh-la-la, thanks a lot! I will definitely try it later today.

Mixed areas are negligible small.

+1. I was going to suggest exactly the same. Almost broke my achievement game. I was lucky to notice minor mod enabled before I rewrote all saves.
Warning window if set of mods gets changed.

Hello. I played mostly in peaceful mode, and now I am trying to design modern turret defense line. Could you please advice how to use flamethrower turrets most efficiently? Are they better to be placed in a solid row or separated, in front or back of laser turrets? Are turrets better to be placed ne...

I accept all arguments from fff-275, but space program without military technologies is the most unrealistic thing in the game.

Manual crafting queue didn't merge consecutive stacks of the same item.

1. Ordered some amount of drills.
2. Ordered maximum amount of drills.
3. Canceled drills that required intermediate crafting.
4. Picked up intermediates.
5. Ordered more drills.

But yeah, perhaps an ingredient of type = "tool", you could specify amount = 0.05 for 5%, that way you can run the recipe 20 times from a single item. I think catalysts don't need degeneration. You always can scale recipe up to integer numbers. But another type of items - сonsumables... (...

Well, I suggested exactly (3) somewhere (can't find already). I like it most. It is simple, intuitive, clarifies Productivity module effect.
P.S. You messed up with uranium so much. Kovarex does 3*U238 ---(40xU235+2xU238)---> 1xU235.

"Craft 200,000 recipes per hour with a single machine". Is it possible in vanilla? It requires that assembling time is 1 tick (1/60 s). Fastest recipes are 0.5 s which need 2300 % speed increase in assembler 3. 12 beacons with speed modules give 1200 % and 4 modules in assembler 200 % whi...

I don't like new achievements like "produce a lot of something". It is boring, game already has enough of this.
I'd like something more creative and entertaining, like :
"run faster then 200kph".
"Craft 200,000 recipes per hour with a single machine".

Very nice, but it is a pity that this is just a balancer.
I would very like full analogue of belt balancer : with ability to prioritize or block input and output lanes, and filter items.
For example, block right input and filter iron plates to right output.

The big question is... Does it make sense to you? Does it make sense to the game? Does it seem reasonable? if you can answer yes, or at the least Maybe to all 3 of these, then go with it, even if it's a simplified process. I am not against simplifications. For example, I'm planning to simplify Alum...