It’s not possible.

Hmm. I keep my power production and water production entirely separate.

It’s not going to be changed, most likely. The developers like that color variety adds to the visual variety even in endgame bases.

Duplicate of but better title than: viewtopic.php?p=636786

Different suggestions should go in separate threads.

I do think it'd be nice if the asteroids weren't set up in such a hard countery way. Like with biters you have 4 main static defense counters, and all 4 work entirely on their own with no help if you want. You go to space, and you get bullets or pain.


There are 4 effective asteroid defenses ...

It seems to have made the orange for thread titles darker, which makes them harder to read against the grey that this forum uses as a background.

You need to process fruit with productivity to ensure sustainable harvests. That means using any amount of productivity modules in an assembler or a biochamber.

mmmPI wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 7:34 pm Yet another very poorly argumented complaint just showing a lack of creativity from the player imo.

Railguns

Rocket turrets are the counter to big asteroids. Railguns are for the huge ones.

There are also reports like 122408 Productivity Modules cannot be used for some intermediate products , that assume that productivity modules can be used on all, and only, recipes in Intermediates.
Putting Foundry's concrete recipe into Logistics tab goes directly against that.


The thread about ...

Why does that justify a recipe producing a logistics product not being in the logistics tab alongside all other concrete recipes?

There are also reports like 122408 Productivity Modules cannot be used for some intermediate products , that assume that productivity modules can be used on all ...

Why does that justify a recipe producing a logistics product not being in the logistics tab alongside all other concrete recipes?

Rseding91 wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:10 pm I was told this is intended.

What’s the rationale, if you don’t mind my asking?

It adds a unique challenge because it can’t be stockpiled, and is one of the few reasons to build platforms that are as fast as possible.

You should post each suggestion in a different thread per the forum rules.

R060 wrote: Tue Jan 14, 2025 11:08 pm The base game tends to be just the SA without SA and in many ways inherits many bugs because of those "mods" that you pay for in DLC.

What bugs does base Factorio 2.0 inherit?

We tend to build far from (0,0) on Gleba. So if you lose your hub and had a bunch of rafts at (0,0), they will eat the Engineer whenever they drop down / respawn and whatever shipped in can't be really used?

Building far from 0,0 puts you in the regions where larger and more frequent raft nests ...

The combination of the two is catastrophic, if you are the type who has never obtained (or attempted to obtain for that matter) any of the speed achievements.

I do not have and do not intend to get any of the speedrun achievements. And I do mean that I have never attempted *any* of them. Getting ...

A question I would like to see answered is how many machines it takes to sustain a given production rate of quality items via conventional and asteroid reprocessing routes. This would include asteroid collectors and the machines needed to run a platform.

I suspect that asteroid reprocessing ends up ...

The game can't read your mind. It can't tell the difference between a network deliberately made to be isolated vs one that was cut off due to power outage, misplaced power pole, or biters conducting renovations.