Thanks for the report. I tried to reproduce it but so far I haven't been able to. If this happens again and you play with replay enabled, could you attach the save file? Also, clear reproduction steps, where you manage to encounter the issue repeatedly, would help a lot because at the moment this is...

Thanks for the report. Logistic containers will have their filters deduplicated when created from blueprints in the next release.

To deduplicate existing containers, you could trigger "prototypes changed" mode by holding Ctrl when pressing "Load" on the save file.

Thanks for the report. Calling deconstruct_area() with mismatched force will not be allowed in the next release.

Thanks for the report. Could you share a blueprint with expected/actual behavior and/or clarify the reproduction steps?

Thanks, the issue should be fixed for the next release.

Some function return values, including delimit_procedure, didn't have the metatable set.

Yes, the compiler can eliminate one of the branches during the compilation process. It can also simplify expressions, such as addition of two constants, to improve runtime preformance as much as possible. The condition doesn't strictly have to be a literal, elimination also works with per-surface co...

Yeah, I understand what you mean but it is not easily doable. The only thing if-else does is deciding which of already computed values should be forwarded/returned from the expression based on the condition. At runtime stage, 'if' has hard depencendies on its arguments, as do all noise operations, i...

This would require a large rework of the noise program system. A noise program, which noise expressions get compiled into, has no concept of branches. All operations in a procedure are sequential and their result can be reused within the procedure if needed. It is similar to delimit_procedure dedupl...

Thanks for the report, the issue should be fixed for the 1.2 major release. Thanks, looking forward to it. I keep going back to playing factorio, best money I ever spend. It seems that I misread your bug report. After reading through it again, the main issue in your report is not fixed, I'm sorry. ...

Thanks for the report, the issue should be fixed for the 2.0 release.

Thanks for the report. In the next release, entities will subtract items collected from ground (modules in your case) from requested items which should fix the issue.

Thanks for the report and for the attached save, it made testing a lot easier. The issue is fixed for the next release.

Thanks for the report. It's now fixed for the next release.

Thanks for the report. The issue was resolved in 1.1.54 (currently experimental). You should be able to see the victory screen and click continue.

Thanks for the report and for the attached save, it made testing a lot easier. The issue is fixed for the next release.

That is the goal, yes. Multiple forces should be able to deconstruct forceless entities at the same time but this is difficult to do in 1.1. Ideally, players also shouldn't see deconstruction markers of other forces.

I have thought about several ways to resolve this issue in 1.1 but none seems like a proper fix and could result in more bug reports. We've done some refactoring in the 1.2 branch, so I would like to target that version and fix this bug properly. For now, all I can suggest is to mine such entities m...

I thought the issue is related to deconstruction by robots but that doesn't seem to be the case. You have a lot of electric poles in your network and I experienced freezes every time I mined one of them. It may be happening because neighboring poles need to check if they are still part of the same n...

Hello, could you post your save file?

Yeah, I let the game run at speed 20, so it would overflow. If you have other save files which are close to max tick value, some community members recommended to do the following: Open editor (/editor) Pick a deconstruction planner and add all types of transport belts to its whitelist (undergrounds ...