3 is not the case. You can easily try yourself: place one wood into tank (tanks tank, actually), drive a metre, nukular fuel into the tank, then drive around -> chugga-chugga-chugga-chuwwhhhEEEEEEEEEEE

48

Don´t get me wrong, we were seriously spoiled by .17:
belt immunity alone is more than I could have asked for, then we got a buff to mining productivity, the quickbar, disable roboports... it is more than fair to give something to the targets biters as well.

V453000 wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:35 pm

They could get more health just to make it clearly different I guess.

Great, just fucking lovely great.
Guys, thank you so much for bringing this up...
</sarcasm>

Ah well, I used nukes anyway as the big worms outrange the regular rocket launcher.

That would be Cheating. And also once you know about a bug you end up noticing it more actively and it can both happen more often and drive you crazy. I have no idea how the effect works, but it seems to be true. Probably a side effect of confirmation bias. I don't want to play old versions as newe...

I know this sounds strange, but unless you are affected by the fixes, you could ... skip the version?
And instead play some more?

Wouldn´t it make sense to add a bypass to the first 2 to 1 junction? You are kind of lacking an uninterrupted "through lane".

Absolutely. My refineries were always not very good until I finally read up on control networks. Worked like a charm ever since and in hindsight, it was trivial. I mean, hey, it is a single wire between a pump and a tank, then set a condition. I was just afraid of all the combinators and stuff. Don´...

I can not think of something which would annoy me more.

GrumpyJoe wrote: ↑

Sun Feb 17, 2019 4:41 pm

Bob´s mods averages about 3-400k, logistics 500k. Angel´s smelting/refining/petrochem ~300k.
Should we make that mandatory for vanilla?

For the love of the gods, PLEASE NO!

So it is possible to mod a "First Aid Grenade"?

Only until all your U235 goes into nukes. You must have quite interesting biter expansion settings, if you can use all nukes which simple building row of few centrifuges can produce. Or I like to blow things up. Your call. :D But quite a lot of my 238 (which I might turn into 235 for nukes) goes in...

Only until all your U235 goes into nukes.

Hannu wrote: ↑

Mon Feb 04, 2019 1:17 pm

I agree. Nukes should destroy also items laying on ground. It would be practical perfect cleaning tool in certain situations.

Does not look too bad. Is the reactor already above 500°C?
Are the powerlines connected to the "live" network? Do they really reach the inner two turbines (which should not stop the outer ones from functioning)?


edit: that red belt has a yellow tunnel which will halve its throughput.

Wow. That was money well spent for a hi-res capable graphics card.

Jap2.0 wrote: ↑

Sun Jan 20, 2019 7:49 pm

I mean, Factorio generally doesn't deal with typical scales.

Yes, and too much is never enough, but ... it is still a lot of fish.

I guess most people won´t start to fish in first place.

Hexicube wrote: ↑

Sat Jan 19, 2019 1:14 pm

How will this affect steam engines and turbines?

Easiest might be a second steam (hot or high pressure?) steam emulating current temperature behavior with steam engine/turbines.

Except for water being turned into steam, temperature is currently unused anyway, isn´t it? I seem to remember it being possible to use other fluids in boilers as well, but do we really want (still) hot sulfuric acid (or lubricant) dissolvig (or burn down) parts of our power plant? Modders might dis...