Jap2.0 wrote:Yep, that looks fine for me too. Just prior to this, the post I was looking at (the second image) had a picture that went outside the post. I really see no pattern in what does and 2what doesn't, though.

Everything on that page looks correct to me.

I'm pretty sure it already does this, since I requested it like 1 year ago?

Each of your instances would still have to process the entire world to be deterministic, so you don't gain anything from this.

The world state is too large, has too many dependencies across it to be able to synchronize it in some reasonable way.

If you post your save, I could tell you how much faster it runs on my pc with a 7700k.

It's an absolute beast for factorio though. Even some of the megabases can be played at stable 60 ups

no

I think you should have it identical to the desk top without the free to play BS I'd pay another 40 for the mobile version as long as it's the same with no exceptions add the right control interface it would work on most smartphones You've probably missed that this post is from april fools 2016 and...

Suggesting microtransactions in factorio. We've reached new levels of stupid that shouldn't even be possible.

All I want from an electric pole redesign is to have the small pole centered in its tile. It drives me crazy the way it can move from one side of its tile to the other just based on its connections to other poles. This makes it really hard to place, because it looks like I've moved it from one tile...

RobertTerwilliger wrote:Speaking about "iconic" medium poles, why noone memorizes old trains???

Because old trains looked far worse than current ones?

How does it look if you just render the current poles at 2x resolution?

Your "Why?" just reads like "I don't know, but it sounds cool".

Where would you actually use this?

It seems pretty broken to me that an underground pipe of the same length moves fluid more efficiently, so I'm just assuming they will fix that at some point. Not sure what the fix is though... making the underground one less efficient just to match the overground ones also seems pretty stupid doesn'...

grimdanfango wrote:Fair points, but I wasn't suggesting adding a dedicated lane-blocker... I've been suggesting adding a simple T-junction belt piece, where each half points in a different direction.

If the T belt is not a new item, how do you build one?

Or do you think underground pipes look prettier? I would not - for flow capacity reasons and the ability to place them beside eachother. An underground pipe of length 10 counts as 1 pipe section for calculating flow, so for longer pipes using underground pipes makes more sense. That also needs to b...

Nope, I would still use lots of underground pipes because most of the time I use UGPs it's for the sake of getting stuff out of the way of construction, and also for flow speed. A UGP is like one pipe length per piece no matter how long it is. It makes a big difference if you have Bob's on the inst...

You could temporarily change the scaling in windows to 100% for that screen, launch factorio and enable manual scaling there, then change it back in windows

What's with all the talk about being the "bad guy"? The changes are great

I don't like loaders because their appearance doesn't suggest their function. Inserters, splitters and underground belts all look nice. A loader is just a rectangular prism. What it does, particularly when filtering, is anyone's guess (from the appearance). Unless the devs can deliver some artwork ...

I don't like loaders because their appearance doesn't suggest their function. Inserters, splitters and underground belts all look nice. A loader is just a rectangular prism. What it does, particularly when filtering, is anyone's guess (from the appearance). Unless the devs can deliver some artwork ...

So basically, you've just shown us why loaders are great - replacing some ugly/bad/overcomplicated solutions with nice and clean ones.