I saw this suggestion before: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=34382
However, your case makes an important point. Server setting like a black-list of players need to be preserved.

The second behavior could be faster if you don't have enough logistic robots. Let's say you have 100 items requested, 100 items in trash slots and only 100 logistic robots. To be honest, they will may act like it is described is second behavior, even with current AI. However, this is not guaranteed ...

To fights and expeditions outside the factory. When you are fighting without nightvision and night falls, you are most likely dead. It is a good enough reason to have it. EDIT: Moreover, I am not saying that nightvision has to completely prevent building factory. Let it just have some kind of downsi...

I like this. Nightvision really needs some disadvantages. Now it is ultimate tool to resolve every problem with lighting. It's irritating in multiplayer when you have to navigate through dark factory because most of the players have nightvision and they don't place any lamps. I would choose the nogh...

There still can be option in settings to turn off the dialog, just to not upset modders.

+1

I create blueprints to use them immediately in the same rotation all the time. It is often a small chunk of factory that looks nearly identical when it is rotated 180 degrees.

My proposition is to allow an autotrash condition to be lower than the request but give requests a higher priority. I feel like autotrash should actually have the highest priority, even above personal request slots. After all, trash is how you make room for more requested items. What's the point of...

That might solve the problem: Confirm dialog on close in windowed mode

I play single-player when I want a challenge. I don't use any kind of cheat then.
With my cousin, it is mostly about fun. There is no reason to repair your factory for fifteen minutes, when you can simply load the game.

Every time before loading a multiplayer game, I have to enter server name, description, etc. It would be helpful to store these data in save file and use them as default values, maybe with exception of a password.

I'm not sure, if "going back in time" is a good game for Factorio. I mean for singleplayer yes, but multiplayer??? Of course it would be bad for big serwers. However, when I play with my cousin only, it would be so good to have this. We have many situations when we load old saves e.g.: &q...

It's a common situation for me, that I must order something that I normally have in my autotrash slots. Setting request, disabling autotrash, wait a little while, deleting request, enabling autotrash - it is so tedious when you do it often. My proposition is to allow an autotrash condition to be low...

Version 0.13 creates a completely new problem with mods: lack of achievements.

This all is not needed, because there is a simple and quite logical solution (2 roboports). This is not really a good solution. Roboports are expensive, need a lot of energy and take huge amount of space. They solve the problem by generating a few other. The perfect solution would be a small, not e...

Well. Example from electro-technics: If you multiply Voltage with Ampere (A battery has 1.5 Volts and the lamp needs for example 0.5 Ampere of electron-flow to bring it to glim) you get Ampere-Volt . Nobody would call it Ampere-Volt (or Volt-Ampere, that is the same!), but this is then just a new U...

I would rather get rid of initial items entirely. You don't really need them, you can make them by yourself pretty quick. And in later phase of game you gather useless items every time you are respawning.

@mexmer

pumping_speed = 1

I would interpret this as 1 unit per 1 game tick. It gives 60 u/s. The factorio wiki also is written that it is 60 u/s.

@ssilk @OdinYggd
Since this is not a good place to discuss about votes on the forum, I created a new thread.
viewtopic.php?f=55&t=33561

To achieve a 2 way switch, you'll need 2 deciders + 1 controller, either a power switch (to turn both on/off or a input-signal (chest/ wire signal/ constant combinator) I don't think this could work. Signal values would loop and sum with themselves every other tick. If I am not wrong, it would take...

I have started this topic in another thread (https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=33385) but this subforum is a lot better place for it. First, I'll paste everything here. This is incredible how much this forum needs a method of voting. Now, the only way to support an idea is to creat...