I think A & B & D | A & C & D | E & F | G will be parsed by the game as (((((A & B & D) | A) & C & D) | E) & F) | G . No, the game parses first all ANDs, and then all ORs. A | B & C | D = A | (B & C) | D OK, you're right: https://forums.factorio.com/v...

For example, there is no way to achieve condition (A & (B | C) & D) | (E & F) | G. There is, you just have to repeat some statements. A & B & D | A & C & D | E & F | G To be precise, this way of combining statements is complete - you can make any logical statement ju...

lol so much critizism Oo I don't know about others but in my case criticism means that I like the game enough to actually care. I like most of the changes but the changes I like aren't the ones I want to do something about so I don't write that much about them. (And I personally might be not that s...

Worms look like they've got hit with a Gaussian Blur grenade

The progress bar for the wait conditions are kinda odd to me, maybe if was a thinner line under the condition box? 🤔 Good point. The bright green bars are magnets for eyes, to the point that it's kind of hard to find the current station, even knowing it's right above them. The gray bar just doesn't...

I love the new train GUI and I hate it. It looks much better and the drag & drop and visual progress indicator will both be super useful. However, the "and" and "or" operations are confusing as ever. I think they are supposed to be parsed from top to bottom without any preced...

mrvn wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 24, 2019 1:23 pm

The only thing to argue is that there probably should be a belt splitter entity that isn't also an underground belt. Just a flat belt with one side of the belt blocked by a barrier.

This. Belt splitting is just taking too much space for such a basic thing.

Devs have a special place in the office for displaying the ideas that every player would like to see implemented. They going there sometimes to look at it and laugh maniacally.

Reanimate! Currently, the character looks stupid around all the time. (See? I've combined "looks stupid" and "looks around". Bad puns are 1000% funnier when explained.) Seriously, though. I don't think we need new sprites. Existing ones are sufficient to cover the entire 360° ran...

Ghost cursor is GREAT! It will solve so many annoyances! I almost stopped regretting wasting so much money on this game. ...and then wasting hundreds of hour to play it. ...and then wasting even more time to make mods and translations. One question though. Is it possible to make ghost cursor out of ...

Add "Depot" station name with "iddle" condition. It means train should go to "Depot" station when no other valid destinations in list. Exit condition may be empty because nowhere to move anyway. But may be used for fuelling purpose for example. You don't even necessari...

Loewchen wrote: ↑

Fri Dec 21, 2018 8:27 pm

5thHorseman wrote: ↑

Fri Dec 21, 2018 8:13 pm

I don't know what you guys screwed up, but I'm noticing a distinct lack of complaints in the replies so it must be something HUGE.

Just wait until the I-want-fluids-to-be-as-simple-as-electricity proponents get here...

I want electricity to be as complex as fluids.

When you place down a burner inserter it has enough initial power to grab some fuel. Same could be used for pumps. When placed they pump some amount of water and then need fuel/electricity to continue. That way when you build your power plant and it gets some water, the boiler turns that into steam...

So now we have green circuits mixed on our uranium belt. Great job devs *twitch* lol gross.jpg all green, it's OK :mrgreen: You never need more than half a lane of green circuits anyway. More efficient to share a lane with another ultra-low quantity item - like an ore. :P I always carry green circu...

WIZ4 wrote: ↑

Fri Nov 16, 2018 5:11 pm

This belt is not enough engine
sf-K5LmHvlc.jpg

OMG, I want that mod now!

The new belts looks really good, but this bothers me... Will entities fall off the ground at the end of a belt, as there are no shown "boundaries" to keep them on place? Yeah a barrier of some kind would make it immediately obvious that there is a stop there. It would make the belt end wi...

I agree that using crappy interface as a game mechanic is always a bad idea, regardless of you excuses.
It's like trying to increase difficulty of a platformer game by making controls glitchy and unreliable.

That tutorial could use some better plot. The monologue of the protagonist is passable but they could be some longer texts at ends/beginnings of missions. I'm not talking about wall of text but some summary written in a way that is fun to read and underlines player accomplishments, maybe some clever...

Its time to implement equipment (or skills) switches which would toggle personal modules on/off like Personal roboport Personal laser defence Night vision Belt immunity Exoskeletons All of these you might want to switch off temporarily without removing them from grid. Like I wanna ride the belt bus...