Yeah, but removing the loop make input taken unevenly, I see it's game behavior. I will try to do that another way.

use an arithmetic combinator to control that.

balanced_unloading.png

0eNrdWU1zmzAQ/SsdnaFFEhjbhx76H3rqdDwybGNNQDBCZJLJ8N8r4TZ2ZS+RcqOXZIRgeXr78XbxKzk2I/RaKkP2r0RWnRrI ...

if you put a 3x3 balancer after what impetus maximus sugested you will get a perfectly balanced input/output.

depending on your setup it may even suffice to put two splitters in the 3-lane bus connecting 1 to 2 and 2 to 3.

No it still don't work,

3x3.jpg

but as a dev answer in my bug report ...

Yeah, but removing the loop make input taken unevenly, I see it's game behavior. I will try to do that another way.

One question though, why there is no problem with the one fed from loader as it's the same balancer ?

Thanks for the answer.

Output belt can be used unevenly and I still want an even use of all input belt (to minimize train time at station).

I made a save to reproduce the issue using only vanilla 0.16.30 and made a bug report. We will see what devs say about it.

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=58725

Hello

Haven't play factorio for months, I saw some weird behavior from my train unloading balancer.

I use 12 belts that get merged two by two to form 6 lane that get balanced into only 3. Because 3 is slower than 6, the 6 input belt are use only half so back up. That way balancer have 6 full belt ...

Oh, I forgot to mention : input must be taken equally as long as both side of output belt are used equally (train unloader).

Getting rid of the top loop create two problem :


Input are taken inequally
Still Gap because only 1 belt and a half go to the rigth splitter.

setup no loop.jpg ...

Hello

I have that problem since early in 0.16. I waited for the belt problem in general to be fixed and as I understand it should be for now.

I feed the wiki's 6 to 3 balancer with 12 stack inserter making the 6 input belt full but the output have gap.

The same balancer feeded with 6 full belt ...

A few people have posted 0.16 updates in this thread, is anyone planning on maintaining a 0.16 fork on the mod portal?
I'd like to include S.C.T. in my modpack, and it works best for save game syncing if all mods are on the portal. From the lack of response from Uberwaffe I'm assuming he's lost ...

It's a campaign related item. No use.

is there any schedule when newly updated sea block pack for 0.16 goes from playtest to stable? I tried it and I really like the progression in early game. I also think maybe SCT can be left out too :)

SCT do bring something with it's own recipe for research pack. More different resources with ...

Zephyrinius wrote:Is the latest bioprocessing compatible with science cost tweaker? I'm unable to put the bio processing science packs into my labs.

I updated SCT to be able to use the bio token in SCT lab. You can grab the update here.

For people that want to be able to use logistics pack and the new bio token from angel, I took cartmen180's 0.16 release of SCT and added the bio token to all SCT lab and logistic to the last two lab.

You can download the release here :

ScienceCostTweaker_0.16.1.zip

I haven't change the recipe ...

Is the latest bioprocessing compatible with science cost tweaker? I'm unable to put the bio processing science packs into my labs.

SCT wasn't updated by the author since quite some time, so if angel added a new pack, no it wouldn't be compatible. The 0.16 release of SCT was only to make it ...

Finally registered to report a bug with scanners: In "complex" setups, when removing the scanner the signal input and output terminals will remain and become unremovable:

aai-remaining-terminal.png
0eNrtWluOozgU3UrJH/MVR9iEQKLullrVv7OCUQkRcFJWgUHGpDtTygJmH7OyWcnYIW8wYEiq01L/VAmwj6 ...

When I loaded your game and looked into the chat I saw that command to edit the bonuses were used :

edited directly..jpg

Those command were also used to edit the bonus on other forces. I don't looked much further since I don't have time now. I will look into the replay later but I think it was ...

Thanks for the reply.
I should have mentioned that we are all on vanilla. No mods whatsoever.
It's also no Scenario or PvP world. Just a normal world we used commands to make forces, so everybody could build his very own base.

When no mods, those two bonus shouldn't appear as they should be zero ...

Those two are moddable bonus. Vanilla game don't provide a way to change them (like researching to increment). It's one of the few things that only exist for modding/scenario purpose like grid in vehicle, equipment to be immune to belt, expensive technology map option.

Mods for battery only : https ...

Bots are boring.

It is satisfying (and fun) to make belt based production chain, even more when you try some specific thing like filling a blue belt with assembler, beacon and modules (speed+prod). Using bot is only a matter of laying roboport, assembler+request/passive storage and having a good ...

Ko-Fi use paypal last time I checked and paypal is more trouble than it's worth, so I don't recommend using it.

Better buy another copy and send a tip with it if you want. If you don't have anyone to gift the copy to, do a giveaway.