As kind of a workaround, I found that creating a simple timer, and pulsing the cargo landing pad with a calcite request once every minute helps reduce the # of times cargo pods are dropped down.


0eNq9VF1uszAQvMs ...

+1

I came here seeking the same thing. Just because inserters do not work this way, doesn't mean that assemblers should too. I think the first valid highest signal should be chosen.

Related: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=119104

Currently if you edit the train group name, it will just change that single train, and you have to copy/paste the settings to all the other trains. It would be nice to have a way to rename a logistic group and have all the other trains use the new name.

I encountered this issue too, and thought all the items in my grid were gone. Took me a little to see what happened, and more of an annoyance to have to rebuild the grid.

I recommend, when placing an item, if the grid is empty, instead of emptying the grid, leave the grid in place as is. Worst case ...

Related: viewtopic.php?p=634360#p634360

I wanted to implement something like this, but no way to manage interrupts in lua ATM

I ran into this issue as well today. When the train limit on the requestor station opened up to 1, 14 trains were dispatched, all trying to deliver to that same station. It’s frustrating, as this seems like it could be addressed relatively simply.

Proposed Solution: A mechanism to check the station ...

TLDR (Via AI):

Main Argument: The quality system in the DLC should offer meaningful upgrades, making higher-tier items genuinely rewarding. Many current bonuses are too limited, making it hard to enjoy the potential of "Legendary" items without mods.

Suggestions for Improvements:

Upgrades ...

From https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?p=632506#p632506:

We have an internal proposal to make it configurable almost everywhere from/to which wire you read/write. So you could output to red and read from green for example.

But this is not a trivial change, and because of all the other ...

Can we merge the "Implemented in 2.0" into just "Implemented" (Now that 2.0 is out)?

+1 Please expose this

+1 for this. Not having ANY way circuit condition wise to read spoilage is kinda lame, and IMO goes against what circuit conditions open up and allow for in game.

Since inserters have a priority level for spoilage, I think adding a utility to the advanced selector to read the circuit values and ...

I encountered this too:
Manually removing it and readded it fixed it

I'm curious why locomotives, wagons, and chests only have health improvements from quality. I think chest size, cargo size, and maybe fuel slots or locomotive speed are all good targets for higher qualities. I'm curious if there was a justification for these omissions.

Notice the top and bottom?

My resolution is 3840x2160:

I saw this issue too on 2.0.10 on the spoilable tip screen. Thought I was going crazy with 2 cursors

I'm trying to take the following blueprint
10-22-2024, 18-29-35.png

On the 2 right arithmetic combinators, I have the following

TOP:
10-22-2024, 18-30-49.png
BOTTOM:
10-22-2024, 18-31-07.png


My goal is to replace 50 with the total count ( 48*p0_s*12 ) to get empty space, and then replace ...

I see YouTuber after YouTuber posting space age videos while I'm sitting here waiting...

I just want to play so badly. I've been waiting for so many months, looking at every (Non-Spoilery) FF. Hurts on so many levels :(

I get the need for early access private testing, but to release the NDA a week ...