My solution strictly better.
I've learned, that people, who said such sentences either are too clever to tell the disadvantages of their idea or they doesn't know it better yet

Or my solution strictly better.
You can disprove my words with one counterexample. Can you do it?


(they have ...

Everybody has his own opinion.
-- German proverb
:)

Please show counterexample where my solution worse.

As I understand the linked article, the solution is already implemented.
Quote please.
Because i understand this quote as "will not be implemented".
I decided that it is not worth it, as we ...

I'm more or less sure for 0.15 a fix of this issue will come.
See https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?f=58&t=27456

My solution strictly better.
It solves all cases without side effects.

See also https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=30845 About Cables and Wires / Make Wires ...

Right now blueprint and power switch don't work together.
If you build some setup with manually connected poles many connections will be wrong.
Because power poles always auto connect to each other and don't remember manual connections.
For example: https://youtu.be/FM_QqLuPXgY?t=3m32s
Copy, paste ...

You expectation is wrong, that doesn't make this a bug. Shift-clicking a power pole removes all current connections from it, nothing more. That's how it's worked since it was implemented. No special status is given, so no further action can take this into account.
My point is: This behavior almost ...

You can not disable connections of a pole, you can only remove the connections that are there right now.
Bug or not this behavior makes this functionality borderline unusable.
I spend a hour designing circuit controlled power net. Placed a pole in wrong place. Few connections broken. This annoying ...

First:
1)Place 2 power poles and use shift+LMB to break connections.
2)Place third pole. It connects to both poles.
Expected behavior: Do not connect to to pole with disabled connections.
3)Remove third pole. 2 first poles reconnected.
Expected behavior: No connection between poles ...

Another strange case.

Don't work for curved rails.

It fixed for my poor biter.

My biter also immune to submachinegun but can be killed by shotgun.

Better solution: burner inserters must not take anything but fuel if have no fuel and its energy less than enough for 2 operations.
In this case burner inserters will not stuck if no fuel on belt for some reason.

Laser turrets for some reason don't attack one biter, but they attack all other biters.

Minimal bluebrint contains one underground belt.

1)Open inventory.
2)Take blue print with train station.
3)Rotate.
4)BOOM!


0.000 2015-07-18 14:07:58; Factorio 0.12.0 (Build 103, win64)
0.000 Operating system: Windows 7 Service Pack 1
0.000 Read data path: C:/Program Files/Factorio/data
0.000 Write data path: C:/Users/<CENSORED>/AppData ...

Sounds like zerg creep.
Most significant effect from this feature is preventing "turret creep" strategy.

I also need:
1)Smart tank. Just like smart chest but for fluids.
2)Circuit controlled pump or valve.
3)Import and maybe export information to/from logistic network.
4)Inverted filter for smart inserter. Just add one checkbox.

I need a flag in the smart inserter that says to take all items not specified in the filter.

Try save and load game. It work for me.

kovarex wrote:Hello, the save for reference doesn't contain the situation, and it works properly for me, I guess we already fixed that.

Probably not. Because save/load fixes this problem.