K4G wrote: ↑

Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:10 pm

It says you have 2527 posts. I think your opinion maybe a little biased.

Man, what I thought of, and I hope Kovarex did as well, is how rad it would be to have a remaster of the original theme.
That would be such a cool homage or easter egg

For those who did not hear it at the time, you can find it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAwPlYtg8GE

Damn, that's amazing! I was hoping for more music, and this certainly overshoots my hopes by a large margin. I do still think, that the first soundtrack, and the current ambient masterpiece still have a right to stand on their own, but I am curious, if the current ambient will not feel like too litt...

FuryoftheStars wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 10, 2024 6:12 pm

aka13 wrote: ↑

Wed Apr 10, 2024 4:30 pm

Time for the yearly bump

Then I guess it's time for the yearly counter comment of being against this unless it's an option. I like and want the game to pause when I open the research window.

Yeah, the option-bump is fine by me

Time for the yearly bump

I have no idea about colorspaces and whatnot, but having a lamp signal with 3x8bits for color would be pretty rad, I think.

Very cool, finally, I love it!

The rocket works on brave as well, no issues there.

Ooh very sexy, I like it. I am not sure I have strong opinions on possible improvements, until I have played around with it for a sufficiently long time. Looking forward to it!

A nice addition, AAI Vehicles selection worked really nicely with spidertrons. With the new logistic presets it will make the spidertrons usable on remote outposts/planets.

Very nice, great changes!

The idea of wireless data transmission has been on my mind for years. I'm even surprised that the development team didn't come up with it much earlier. There is a lot of fun in laying wires. But it is tiring, and sometimes you opt for the simple solution of not laying wires, relying on simple thing...

I like that a lot, thank you for including that. BLueprinting all large poles with wires was boring and tedious.

I'd go +1 with Tertius and Koub, that while I also would enjoy more "fun" pipe mechanics, in the end it's a supply-demand problem. As long as you produce at least some amount over the required minimum, your system will balance out. In all other cases, yeah, for maintaining flow pumps are a...

Earendel, you are a magician. You make me warm up to cliffs!
Thank you for the effort, I am really looking forward to the Nauvis changes.

Anyone knows if early early adopters of Factorio (bought it way back in early days) will qualify for a free update? … 2.0 was a paid DLC, right? (Sorry, did forgot if it was stated, at all) I don't have any official source, but I would personally be VERY surprised : Wube's stance has always been : ...

Anyone knows if early early adopters of Factorio (bought it way back in early days) will qualify for a free update? … 2.0 was a paid DLC, right? (Sorry, did forgot if it was stated, at all) I don't have any official source, but I would personally be VERY surprised : Wube's stance has always been : ...

I also believe that while there is obviously deliberately no reaction on the forum to the feedback, that the feedback is nevertheless accounted and acted upon.
It would be a shame, having such an important aspect of the game as enemies not receive at least some feedback.

I love it, that's just so great! All of it, every part. Thank you guys, that was a cherry missing on top the user-configurable alerts all the time.

GregoriusT wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:03 pm

somehow.
You know such a thing COULD be solved by just putting Turrets at the Hole, right?

It's not the sinister random danger then, rather another game sin, where you can not entirely purge an enemy.
I enjoy the charme of being able to forcefully remove the biters too much