To be clear, my "real goal" here is to be able to identify what entity was just destroyed as soon as possible after the entity gets destroyed.

Are you suggesting that when I mine two entities in the same tick I will always get the mined entity event for one, then the mined item event for the same one, then the mined entity event for the other, then the mined item event for the other? I'm not sure how to test this assumption; experiments wo...

Still wishing for this feature. It would simplify so many mods, and eliminate bugs in a lot of them.

Yes, but when that event fires the entity is still in the world, so none of my checks are valid yet. I need to run my checks after the entity is destroyed, and on_player_mined_item seems to be the only event that triggers at that point.

I want five names with sequential starting letters, preferably not starting at A or ending at Z to allow for expansion later.

Common
D
Enhanced
Fine
Great


Normal
Optimized
Pristine
Q
Refined

etc

FYI you can overlap train stations already. I do this in some of my tiny rail grid factories. Put 3 stops on the same rail right next to each other. Name them "Iron Dropoff" "Stone Dropoff" etc. Then line the track with inserters to unload all the possible wagon locations. Balanc...

I'm making a Fast Trains mod. will you are it here when I am done with it and it has been uploaded to the mod portal? Probably not. This list covers mostly mods that provide new UI and gameplay mechanics. There are far too many mods that just modify/add train entities to ever cover with a writeup l...

Rseding91 wrote: ↑

Fri Jan 19, 2024 1:24 am

The thing is… inserter speeds don’t have any meaning except “it’s fast enough” or “it’s not so add more inserters.”

Plenty of players like to make ratio-perfect builds where possible. Some of them include inserters in those calculations.

Unknow0059 wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 16, 2024 2:39 pm

This is cool, but someone bothered to add colors to items in belts so their movement is easier to see, but no one stopped the belts from animating for stopped belts?

My kingdom for a way to detect when a belt is stopped!

It's easy to avoid collisions, by having chain signals prior to the junction, and rail signals after the junction. That "locks" the junction itself, for one train at a time. The question is: is it possible to build a MUX junction, that multiple trains can use simultaneously (assuming they...

I found myself asking when the pvp scenario was added and when certain parts of it were changed, then discovered that https://github.com/wube/factorio-data/tree/master/base only has migrations and prototypes. It would be nice if scenarios were tracked there as well. campaigns and tutorials would be ...

I understand the order answer for the second example, but not for the first. Do you mean that a tuple that takes one string and one number will always be the first string and first number in the sorted fields?

I think that prototype type and prototype name form a unique key. If so, it would be helpful to have that called out in the API docs, ditto for other similar unique single fields or combinations of types/fields.

ItemProductPrototype :: struct or {ItemID, uint16} https://lua-api.factorio.com/latest/types/ItemProductPrototype.html When using the `{ItemID, uint16}` version, what does the second value represent? In this case I think it's `amount`, but that's not specified anywhere in the docs. SpawnPoint :: st...

I would like to implement the behavior described in https://forums.factorio.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=109643 as a mod. To do so, I need to be able to trigger updates of control behaviors and circuit networks. A method to update all circuit networks would work, but be wasteful compared to one to up...

TL;DR Instead of one operation per tick, quality combinators could run faster. What ? Currently every combinator runs one operation per tick. My idea is for combinators with higher than normal quality to run multiple iterations of their assigned operation. Adding a single such combinator would have...

Placing two signals adjacent that DON'T produce distinct rail block break locations would be a different use case. Perhaps that would still be illegal. Perhaps it would produce a zero-length block. Perhaps it would be handled as a new case. This is the case that's more relevant to tiling blueprint c...

Here we have two signals on the top rail that produce distinct breaks in the rail blocks.

The signals on the middle and bottom rail produce the same breaks, but aren't allowed to be placed on the same rail.

Double-necro. With all the rail changes coming in 2.0, including new curves with new signal placement positions including some funky ones, maybe there's a chance...

Implemented in 2.0?